Re: Improving your archive and package system for small package

Hi! On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 13:26:12 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Seems Osamu Aoki is working on at least part of the puzzle: > > https://bugs.debian.org/797045 > > Merging multiple sources *really* shouldn't be necessary. And the > metadata for those sources will

Re: Improving your archive and package system for small package

Hi! On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 17:28:38 +0200, Adrien CLERC wrote: > This may have been discussed before, but could we achieve something like > this with virtual package? With the implemented version Provides, which means having versioned virtual packages, this is actually probably a good solution,

Re: Improving your archive and package system for small package

On 03/09/15, 03:13pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > I was thinking generally, perl latex python have a lot of small > package. Each language could not come with its own solution. Maybe > creating a tool agregating small debian package in a big one. But > doing something only for javascript is not a

Re: Improving your archive and package system for small package

Le 03/09/2015 13:36, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > Hi, > > In order to improve node situation we need to improve the small > packages problems. > > What are the main bottlenet ? What could be done to improve the situation ? > > The node small package does not change often so it could be a win to >

Re: Improving your archive and package system for small package

Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2015-09-03 13:36:15) > In order to improve node situation we need to improve the small > packages problems. > > What are the main bottlenet ? What could be done to improve the > situation ? > > The node small package does not change often so it could be a win to >

Re: Improving your archive and package system for small package

Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Seems Osamu Aoki is working on at least part of the puzzle: > https://bugs.debian.org/797045 Merging multiple sources *really* shouldn't be necessary. And the metadata for those sources will vary, so that likely won't save that much space. Perhaps we should add a few

Re: Improving your archive and package system for small package

Quoting Josh Triplett (2015-09-03 22:26:12) > Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Seems Osamu Aoki is working on at least part of the puzzle: >> https://bugs.debian.org/797045 > > Merging multiple sources *really* shouldn't be necessary. And the > metadata for those sources will vary, so that likely

Improving your archive and package system for small package

Hi, In order to improve node situation we need to improve the small packages problems. What are the main bottlenet ? What could be done to improve the situation ? The node small package does not change often so it could be a win to your archive size. Moreover if we could solve this problem we

Re: Improving your archive and package system for small package

2015-09-03 13:36 GMT+02:00 Bastien ROUCARIES : > Hi, > > In order to improve node situation we need to improve the small > packages problems. > > What are the main bottlenet ? What could be done to improve the situation ? > > The node small package does not change

Re: Improving your archive and package system for small package

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > 2015-09-03 13:36 GMT+02:00 Bastien ROUCARIES : >> >> Hi, >> >> In order to improve node situation we need to improve the small >> packages problems. >> >> What are the main bottlenet ? What