On Saturday 30 January 1999, at 16 h 41, the keyboard of Paul Seelig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, let's be serious again: unfortunately this actually means that
some of the most obvious installation profiles of slink stay to be
unnecessarily bloated.
Giving the size of the current
Might it be possible to include fewer packages in each profile and then
present the user with a list of additional packages that might be of
interest to them given that they have chosen this particular profile?
Something like You have installed the Scientific Workstation profile. The
[ redundant emacs versions ]
Well, I'll suggest that for potato. It will start a nice flame-war on
debian-devel emacs vs. xemacs.
Hey, that's just what we need at this stage for *slink*! :-)
Okay, let's be serious again: unfortunately this actually means that
some of the most
Paul Seelig writes:
Myself i do prefer XEmacs over all other variants but wouldn't mind if
i had to install it later on my own.
I prefer emacs, bu I also wouldn't mind if i had to install it later on
my own. In fact, I would not mind at all if emacs was optional.
IMHO it would be much wiser
4 matches
Mail list logo
