Re: Intent to hijack gtkglext

2008-02-18 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've already prepared an upload for this. It should hopefully go > sometime today. Great; thanks for taking it off my DDPO page. ;-) -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/c

Re: Intent to hijack gtkglext

2008-02-18 Thread William Pitcock
Hi, On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 11:15 +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 09:20:12PM -0600, William Pitcock wrote: > > > The current maintainer of gtkglext has not been maintaining the package > > since 2004. The last upload was in 2006 to fix an NMU, which has not > > been acknowledge

Re: Intent to hijack gtkglext

2008-02-18 Thread Guus Sliepen
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 09:20:12PM -0600, William Pitcock wrote: > The current maintainer of gtkglext has not been maintaining the package > since 2004. The last upload was in 2006 to fix an NMU, which has not > been acknowledged yet. The current package is two major versions out of > date (1.0 vs

Intent to hijack gtkglext

2008-02-17 Thread William Pitcock
Hello, The current maintainer of gtkglext has not been maintaining the package since 2004. The last upload was in 2006 to fix an NMU, which has not been acknowledged yet. The current package is two major versions out of date (1.0 vs 1.2). I need a newer version of gtkglext for various projects I