Re: Intent to package: daemontools (and cdb)

1999-01-19 Thread Tommi Virtanen
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 07:06:21PM +, Edward Betts wrote: > > > According to the README in the CDB archive, the CDB C source is public > > > domain, so if you strip out the docs, etc. you could put it in main. > > Yes. But as that doesn't cover even the manpages, > > or pedantically eve

Re: Intent to package: daemontools (and cdb)

1999-01-18 Thread Edward Betts
On Mon, 18 Jan, 1999, Tommi Virtanen wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 09:34:43PM +1300, Carey Evans wrote: > > According to the README in the CDB archive, the CDB C source is public > > domain, so if you strip out the docs, etc. you could put it in main. > > Yes. But as that doesn't cover ev

Re: Intent to package: daemontools (and cdb)

1999-01-18 Thread Tommi Virtanen
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 10:45:34AM +0200, Tommi Virtanen wrote: > > Also, Exim uses a GPL'ed CDB. From spec.txt.gz: > > . Support for the cdb (Constant DataBase) lookup method is > > provided by code contributed by Nigel Metheringham of Planet Online > > Ltd. which contains the following state

Re: Intent to package: daemontools (and cdb)

1999-01-18 Thread Tommi Virtanen
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 09:34:43PM +1300, Carey Evans wrote: > According to the README in the CDB archive, the CDB C source is public > domain, so if you strip out the docs, etc. you could put it in main. Yes. But as that doesn't cover even the manpages, or pedantically even the Ma

Re: Intent to package: daemontools (and cdb)

1999-01-18 Thread Carey Evans
Tommi Virtanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I already packaged cdb as cdb-src (like qmail-src): > > Package: cdb > Status: install ok installed > Priority: optional > Section: non-free/utils According to the README in the CDB archive, the CDB C source is public domain, so if you strip out