Re: Is a free document whose sources have been lost free?

2008-01-27 Thread Joe Smith
"Charles Plessy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Le Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:35:16PM -0800, Don Armstrong a écrit : Unless the pdf is exceptionally complicated, it's not all that difficult to resurect LaTeX that does a similar job; it'd probably be ideal to do this a

Re: Is a free document whose sources have been lost free?

2008-01-27 Thread Charles Plessy
> Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > To make the dialign-t package, I removed the documentation from the > > upstream tarball, that I use for a dialign-t-doc package, in the > > non-free section as the their LaTeX sources are not provided. > > > > Now, I was informed that the reason is

Re: Is a free document whose sources have been lost free?

2008-01-25 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Charles Plessy wrote: > To make the dialign-t package, I removed the documentation from the > upstream tarball, that I use for a dialign-t-doc package, in the > non-free section as the their LaTeX sources are not provided. > > Now, I was informed that the reason is that the so

Re: Is a free document whose sources have been lost free?

2008-01-25 Thread Russ Allbery
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > To make the dialign-t package, I removed the documentation from the > upstream tarball, that I use for a dialign-t-doc package, in the > non-free section as the their LaTeX sources are not provided. > > Now, I was informed that the reason is that the so

Is a free document whose sources have been lost free?

2008-01-25 Thread Charles Plessy
Dear all, To make the dialign-t package, I removed the documentation from the upstream tarball, that I use for a dialign-t-doc package, in the non-free section as the their LaTeX sources are not provided. Now, I was informed that the reason is that the sources have been lost. In that case, don't