Re: Is mesa actually maintained?

2006-01-22 Thread David Nusinow
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:18:18PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: I've got an NMU prepared and sitting in the XSF svn repo[0]. Almost all the work was done by Daniel Stone, so I mainly had to add the appropriate bug closers in the changelog. This NMU will depend on a new version of libdrm.

Re: Is mesa actually maintained?

2006-01-10 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 11:25:17AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 09:26:33AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: Hello! This is one of 5 RC bugs, apparently with no maintainer response. Apparently the list which is listed as the maintainer is rejecting messages (336752),

Is mesa actually maintained?

2006-01-06 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Hello! This is one of 5 RC bugs, apparently with no maintainer response. Apparently the list which is listed as the maintainer is rejecting messages (336752), which probably contributes to the problem. Hence the Cc: to debian-devel. This bug is trivial to fix, and because it prevents mesa

Re: Is mesa actually maintained?

2006-01-06 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 09:26:33AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: Hello! This is one of 5 RC bugs, apparently with no maintainer response. Apparently the list which is listed as the maintainer is rejecting messages (336752), which probably contributes to the problem. Hence the Cc: to