I have no issue with Adept, and I would love to see a good Qt/KDE
package manager, but if we're to get KPackageKit, I'd like to be sure
that we won't sponsor yet another APT front-end that won't be used.
Still, it remains the aptitude-qt solution.
But it seems aptitude code is tighten with
Fathi Boudra a écrit :
I have no issue with Adept, and I would love to see a good Qt/KDE
package manager, but if we're to get KPackageKit, I'd like to be sure
that we won't sponsor yet another APT front-end that won't be used.
Still, it remains the aptitude-qt solution.
But it seems
Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
* KDE/Qt4 Adept 3.0 Package Manager *
-
Student: Mateusz Marek, Mentor: *NEEDS MENTOR, see below.*
Finish Adept 3.0, a fully integrated package manager for Qt4/KDE4.
Adept is currently the only viable path to a Debian native package
On 2009-04-11, Filipus Klutiero chea...@gmail.com wrote:
Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
* KDE/Qt4 Adept 3.0 Package Manager *
-
Student: Mateusz Marek, Mentor: *NEEDS MENTOR, see below.*
Finish Adept 3.0, a fully integrated package manager for Qt4/KDE4.
Adept
4 matches
Mail list logo
