On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 03:19:14PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve Many people consider all of options a), b), and c) to be
Steve inappropriate, and will instead encrypt each of the uid
Steve signatures individually and mail them to
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 03:19:14PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this process correct? Or did something go seriously wrong
here? If it was correct, why was it correct? If it was wrong,
why was it wrong?
For anyone who didn't
Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this process correct? Or did something go seriously wrong
here? If it was correct, why was it correct? If it was wrong,
why was it wrong?
For anyone who didn't pick it up; I lied: [EMAIL PROTECTED] isn't my
email address.
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 12:10:15AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 07:49:51AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 11:17:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
What are we setting out to achieve?
- To verify that the person so identified controls a
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 11:49:29AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
Can I please ask the blindingly obvious question that is so obvious
nobody has asked?
What is the point of keysigning?
What are we setting out to achieve?
- To authenticate a person's real-world identity
- To verify that the person
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 11:17:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
What are we setting out to achieve?
- To verify that the person so identified controls a specific email address
What does 'control' mean here? Given this:
Many people consider all of options a), b), and c) to be inappropriate,
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 07:49:51AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 11:17:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
What are we setting out to achieve?
- To verify that the person so identified controls a specific email address
What does 'control' mean here? Given this:
Wesley == Wesley J Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wesley I wrote this up to someone. I thought I'd share it, and
Wesley get your thoughts. (e.g. anybody see any weaknesses in
Wesley #1-#3 that *aren't* present in the typical meet, check ID,
Wesley get GPG fingerprint,
Ron Johnson dijo [Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 05:48:46AM -0500]:
A while ago, in an IRC discussion, it was revealed that a notary in the
US doesn't mean as much as it does in Europe.
AIUI, in the US, a notary is just some extra title a lot of secretaries
have, so that they can make some
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:52:03 +0100
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 02:13:54PM -0600, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 14:11, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:03:12AM -0600, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
[snip]
A notary doesn't
* Wouter Verhelst:
Well, in Belgium it's not /that/ bad (a notary is required by law to
give you free advice), but the moment he uses his stamp, it indeed is a
three digit bill (around ยค900 last time I required the use of a notary's
services)
The fee depends in part on the value of the
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 02:17:50 +0200, Bernd Eckenfels
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In germany the post offices offer a service where you hand the clerk your id
and he will check it, enter the details into a letter which he sends to the
receipient. This is called postident.
That way you can do age
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
I was told to get a notarised form for a domain transfer before the domain
registrar would release it. I ended up losing the domain (_) because I
discovered that to find a notary in Australia, you have to go to a US Embassy.
Huh? I've delivered
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 01:36:26 +0300
Jaakko Niemi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
I was told to get a notarised form for a domain transfer before the domain
registrar would release it. I ended up losing the domain (_) because I
discovered that to find a
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 01:36:26AM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
I was told to get a notarised form for a domain transfer before the domain
registrar would release it. I ended up losing the domain (_) because I
discovered that to find a notary in
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:54:51AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2005 14:13:54 -0600, Wesley J. Landaker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, but they have to get it notarized (or forge a notary's seal, which is
a criminal offense, at least in the US) which requires government ID
On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 07:54:51 +0200
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2005 14:13:54 -0600, Wesley J. Landaker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, but they have to get it notarized (or forge a notary's seal, which is
a criminal offense, at least in the US) which requires
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 10:14:43 +0200
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:54:51AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2005 14:13:54 -0600, Wesley J. Landaker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, but they have to get it notarized (or forge a notary's seal, which
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 02:13:54PM -0600, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 14:11, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:03:12AM -0600, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
I wrote this up to someone. I thought I'd share it, and get your
thoughts. (e.g. anybody see any
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 05:48:46AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 10:14:43 +0200
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:54:51AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2005 14:13:54 -0600, Wesley J. Landaker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right,
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 04:52, Andrew Suffield wrote:
Right, but they have to get it notarized (or forge a notary's seal,
which is a criminal offense, at least in the US) which requires
government ID (again, at least in the US).
A notary doesn't certify that the document you hand them is
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 23:54, Marc Haber wrote:
The entire procedure is quite US centric. I don't understand why you
US guys are so fond of your notaries. Over here, it's a three digit
bill for the notary to open the office door and to offer you a chair,
so there might be cultures where one
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 23:54, Marc Haber wrote:
The entire procedure is quite US centric. I don't understand why you
US guys are so fond of your notaries. Over here, it's a three digit
bill for the notary to open the office door and to offer you a chair,
so there might be cultures where one
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Well, the whole point is that they also certify that you are who you say you
are, i.e. they check your ID.
In germany the post offices offer a service where you hand the clerk your id
and he will check it, enter the details into a letter which he sends
Hi folks,
I wrote this up to someone. I thought I'd share it, and get your thoughts.
(e.g. anybody see any weaknesses in #1-#3 that *aren't* present in the
typical meet, check ID, get GPG fingerprint, assuming #4 is always used
afterwards?)
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 08:44, Wesley J. Landaker
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:03:12AM -0600, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
I wrote this up to someone. I thought I'd share it, and get your thoughts.
(e.g. anybody see any weaknesses in #1-#3 that *aren't* present in the
typical meet, check ID, get GPG fingerprint, assuming #4 is always used
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 14:11, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:03:12AM -0600, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
I wrote this up to someone. I thought I'd share it, and get your
thoughts. (e.g. anybody see any weaknesses in #1-#3 that *aren't*
present in the typical meet, check ID,
On Tue, 31 May 2005 14:13:54 -0600
Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 14:11, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:03:12AM -0600, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
I wrote this up to someone. I thought I'd share it, and get your
thoughts. (e.g. anybody
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 20:48, Jacob S wrote:
Regardless, how is this different from meeting someone in person? They
can just show me their fake ID--I won't know it's fake. (And, as you
said, forged ID happens a lot and is easily available. =)
So why bother with steps 1 2 when 3 is the
On Tue, 31 May 2005 14:13:54 -0600, Wesley J. Landaker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, but they have to get it notarized (or forge a notary's seal, which is
a criminal offense, at least in the US) which requires government ID
(again, at least in the US).
The entire procedure is quite US
30 matches
Mail list logo
