On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 16:49:57 -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
NOTE: For those that are on the ball, they do seem to be considering
removing idea from the base source and having it as a seperate module
(similar to GnuPG's approach).
Another freeness issue (albeit a relatively minor one) is that
On Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 12:50:52PM +0100, J.H.M. Dassen wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 16:49:57 -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
NOTE: For those that are on the ball, they do seem to be considering
removing idea from the base source and having it as a seperate module
(similar to GnuPG's approach).
J.H.M. Dassen wrote:
Another freeness issue (albeit a relatively minor one) is that currently
lsh requires scsh (which is non-free) for the generation of include files
(they are pregenerated in the tarball; the scsh scripts are needed only
for development). It would be nice if someone could
I've just looked over some of the code for the latest LSH snapshot
(1-21-99) and it seems to be turning into a decent program. It is lacking
some critical features (listed below), but once they are implemented, we
may want to consider this our ssh replacement (the final blow to the
non-free
4 matches
Mail list logo