Lintian magic-arch-in-arch-list

2009-06-22 Thread Shaun Jackman
I have a source package with two binary packages. One binary package is arch i386 amd64, the other is arch all containing the architecture-independent data files. The resulting dsc file is Architecture: amd64 i386 all which lintan complains about: E: eagle source: magic-arch-in-arch-list I'm

Re: Lintian magic-arch-in-arch-list

2009-06-22 Thread Cyril Brulebois
: E: eagle source: magic-arch-in-arch-list From lintian sources: | Tag: magic-arch-in-arch-list | Severity: serious | Certainty: certain | Info: The special architecture value any only make sense if it occurs | alone. The value all may appear together with other architectures | in a *.dsc file

Re: Lintian magic-arch-in-arch-list

2009-06-22 Thread Mauro Lizaur
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Shaun Jackman wrote: I have a source package with two binary packages. One binary package is arch i386 amd64, the other is arch all containing the architecture-independent data files. The resulting dsc file is Architecture: amd64 i386 all which lintan complains about:

Re: Lintian magic-arch-in-arch-list

2009-06-22 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2009-06-22, Shaun Jackman sjack...@gmail.com wrote: I have a source package with two binary packages. One binary package is arch i386 amd64, the other is arch all containing the architecture-independent data files. The resulting dsc file is Architecture: amd64 i386 all which lintan

Re: Lintian magic-arch-in-arch-list

2009-06-22 Thread Russ Allbery
Philipp Kern tr...@philkern.de writes: As explained lintian was wrong after I dropped the bit that collapsed amd64 i386 all to any in dpkg-source. The problem is that we lost information about what needs to be built where. any if there is one i386 and one all binary package is just plain

Re: Lintian magic-arch-in-arch-list

2009-06-22 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2009-06-22, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote: Philipp Kern tr...@philkern.de writes: As explained lintian was wrong after I dropped the bit that collapsed amd64 i386 all to any in dpkg-source. The problem is that we lost information about what needs to be built where. any if there is

Re: Lintian magic-arch-in-arch-list

2009-06-22 Thread Russ Allbery
Philipp Kern tr...@philkern.de writes: On 2009-06-22, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote: Philipp Kern tr...@philkern.de writes: As explained lintian was wrong after I dropped the bit that collapsed amd64 i386 all to any in dpkg-source. The problem is that we lost information about what