]] anatoly techtonik
| Do you mean that all these packages need to stick to the stable
| standard version of some Module available in Debian? I personally
| think that fit is a bad idea, because by upgrading such Module it is
| possible to break Python Application that require older version of
Hi,
Jakub Wilk wrote:
I am going to file a few dozens of bugs against packages that are embedding
copies of Python modules; more specifically:
- modules available as separate Debian packages: argparse, beautifulsoup,
clientform, coherence, configobj, elementtree, feedparser, mechanize,
I am going to file a few dozens of bugs against packages that are embedding
copies of Python modules; more specifically:
- modules available as separate Debian packages: argparse, beautifulsoup,
clientform, coherence, configobj, elementtree, feedparser, mechanize, pexpect,
ply, pyparsing,
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 05:43:20PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk
rednotebook
Because rednotebook embeds a copy of txt2tags presumably? This is because
it uses some features in txt2tags's VCS that aren't yet released, and I'm
already working closely
2009/11/8 Jakub Wilk uba...@users.sf.net:
I am going to file a few dozens of bugs against packages that are embedding
copies of Python modules; more specifically:
Do you mean that all these packages need to stick to the stable
standard version of some Module available in Debian? I personally
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com writes:
2009/11/8 Jakub Wilk uba...@users.sf.net:
I am going to file a few dozens of bugs against packages that are
embedding copies of Python modules; more specifically:
Do you mean that all these packages need to stick to the stable
standard version
6 matches
Mail list logo
