Re: Marking BTS spam

2006-04-21 Thread Julian Gilbey
Just saw this thread mentioned on DWN. Do you know about "bts reportspam NN" or "bts spamreport NN" in the devscripts package? Might do just what you want :) Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Marking BTS spam

2006-04-20 Thread Kevin Mark
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:06:17PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Just saw this thread mentioned on DWN. > > Do you know about "bts reportspam NN" or "bts spamreport NN" > in the devscripts package? Might do just what you want :) > >Julian Hi Julian, thanks for the update! It seems th

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-03-09 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a) hast geschrieben: >Well. I have reported "through the button" in the past months spam for three >different mailing lists (debian-doc, debian-l10n-spanish, and >debian-devel-spanish) and I *still* see the reported spam there [1]. So I'm a >little bit skep

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-03-03 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 05:44:51AM -0600, Cord Beermann wrote: > The button is good for pointing out where we should remove something. Well. I have reported "through the button" in the past months spam for three different mailing lists (debian-doc, debian-l10n-spanish, and debian-devel-spanish) a

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-03-03 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a) hast geschrieben: >Well, I thought it would be useful to > >a) have spam mails from the mailing list archive >b) enhance the filters for that we have the 'report as spam'-Button. We also use that input for the filters, but mainly, the damage is done in

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-03-02 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:33:04AM -0600, Cord Beermann wrote: > it's not ok to bounce us spam from years ago, this address is another > feedback-loop to enhace our filters, it's useless to get old[1] spam > there. Well, I thought it would be useful to a) have spam mails from the mailing list a

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-03-02 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a) hast geschrieben: >I've just bounced all the spam from Debian mailing lists that got through my >(local and ISP's) filters and I had stored in a separate folder to that >address. They are 33, hopefully it will not get me blacklisted. > >Is it OK if we, mu

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-03-01 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 02:13:51AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:47:41 +0100]: > > > Is it OK if we, mutt users, use this? > > Why not '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'? ('b' does (B)ounce > in the default keybindings). THat's what Cord asked for... Ou

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-28 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:47:41 +0100]: > Is it OK if we, mutt users, use this? Why not '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'? ('b' does (B)ounce in the default keybindings). THat's what Cord asked for... -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-28 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 07:03:31AM -0600, Cord Beermann wrote: > > If you get spam via our lists, BOUNCE[1] it to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] The advantage of posting it here is that it can be used as a measure of how much spam does posting to a debian mailing attracts, spammers will probably send some

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-28 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Amaya) hast geschrieben: >Cord Beermann wrote: >> Also we (the listmasters) don't train the bayes-filter, > >May I ask why? You may. ;-) I looked into this and found that we automagically train the bayes with the spam we get, but we don't train in the ham. Another thing for the ever

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-25 Thread Amaya
Hi Cord! First of all, thanks for the listamster work involving spam. Cord Beermann wrote: > Also we (the listmasters) don't train the bayes-filter, May I ask why? > we add also rules to procmail and SpamAssassin if nessecary. That's great, thanks. -- .''`. I may not have gone where I in

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-25 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Blars Blarson) hast geschrieben: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >>on 2: we would need a whole spam-mail including all headers so we can >> find charakteristika to filter on, so i now take all nominated >> postings, and try to find patterns with some

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-24 Thread Blars Blarson
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >on 2: we would need a whole spam-mail including all headers so we can > find charakteristika to filter on, so i now take all nominated > postings, and try to find patterns with some black > shell-magic. Is "sa-learn --spam

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-24 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-24 14:31]: > Hallo! Du (Cord Beermann) hast geschrieben: > > >The idea of having a reporting address is good, i'll will announce one > >in the next days and then lets see what happens. > > ok, here it is: (alpha release, lets see what happens and i

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-24 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Cord Beermann) hast geschrieben: >The idea of having a reporting address is good, i'll will announce one >in the next days and then lets see what happens. ok, here it is: (alpha release, lets see what happens and if it is useful.) If you get spam via our lists, BOUNCE[1] it to [EMAIL

lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-24 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Nico Golde) hast geschrieben: >At the moment the spam-report.pl script uses: > > > >To identify the message, this wouldn't work with a MUA so the idea came >to my mind was to identify the Mail with the message-ID. >Paskal Hakim asked what happens if someone fakes the message-ID in the

Re: Marking BTS spam

2006-02-24 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Blars Blarson) hast geschrieben: >The lists.debian.org spam "button" doesn't have much immediate effect. correct, but we are working on it. Cord -- http://lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA

Re: Marking BTS spam

2006-02-22 Thread David Weinehall
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 04:33:57AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote: [snip] > Hi Nico, > I just had an interesting idea to implement a way to get spam deleted > from @debian.org. Create an email address say [EMAIL PROTECTED] You > simply bounce/forward a debian.org email address to this address. A > script

Re: Marking BTS spam

2006-02-22 Thread Kevin Mark
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 08:20:45AM +0100, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > * Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-22 07:51]: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:07:39PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: > > > Is it possible to mark a particular message to the BTS (as in > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]) as spam? This info

Re: Marking BTS spam

2006-02-22 Thread Blars Blarson
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >there was added a 'button' on all bug-number pages to 'mark as spam' on >near the bottom but IIRC it was marked as an experimental project to >only collect data for future use. If this has been implemented and >affect filtering, I guess the

Re: Marking BTS spam

2006-02-22 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-22 09:24]: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 08:20:45AM +0100, Nico Golde wrote: > > * Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-22 07:51]: > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:07:39PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: > > > > Is it possible to mark a particular message to

Re: Marking BTS spam

2006-02-22 Thread Kevin Mark
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 08:20:45AM +0100, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > * Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-22 07:51]: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:07:39PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: > > > Is it possible to mark a particular message to the BTS (as in > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]) as spam? This info

Re: Marking BTS spam

2006-02-21 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-22 07:51]: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:07:39PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: > > Is it possible to mark a particular message to the BTS (as in > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]) as spam? This information could be used for > > filtering the web page reports, or possi

Re: Marking BTS spam

2006-02-21 Thread Kevin Mark
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:07:39PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: > Is it possible to mark a particular message to the BTS (as in > [EMAIL PROTECTED]) as spam? This information could be used for > filtering the web page reports, or possibly training the s

Re: Marking BTS spam

2006-02-21 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Shaun Jackman wrote: > Is it possible to mark a particular message to the BTS (as in > [EMAIL PROTECTED]) as spam? This information could be used for > filtering the web page reports, or possibly training the spam filter. Visit http://bugs.debian.org/ Click: "Send a report th

Marking BTS spam

2006-02-21 Thread Shaun Jackman
Is it possible to mark a particular message to the BTS (as in [EMAIL PROTECTED]) as spam? This information could be used for filtering the web page reports, or possibly training the spam filter. Thanks! Shaun