Re: Mass bug filing: FTBFS because of using imake without Build-Depends on xutils-dev

2008-06-08 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
(Cced debian-x@) On 07/06/08 at 21:13 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 07:26:05PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote: From the changelog for xorg 1:7.3+11: * Remove the dependency of xutils against xutils-dev, it was only useful for transitional purpose in Etch,

Re: Mass bug filing: FTBFS because of using imake without Build-Depends on xutils-dev

2008-06-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 09:24:45 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: I found those issues as well (there are 84 packages failing to build because of that). I discussed this briefly on #debian-x, but it's not clear yet if the X maintainers want to revert this change. I would personally prefer if

Re: Mass bug filing: FTBFS because of using imake without Build-Depends on xutils-dev

2008-06-08 Thread Daniel Schepler
On Sunday 08 June 2008 02:55:23 am Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 09:24:45 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: I found those issues as well (there are 84 packages failing to build because of that). I discussed this briefly on #debian-x, but it's not clear yet if the X maintainers

Mass bug filing: FTBFS because of using imake without Build-Depends on xutils-dev

2008-06-07 Thread Daniel Schepler
From the changelog for xorg 1:7.3+11: * Remove the dependency of xutils against xutils-dev, it was only useful for transitional purpose in Etch, closes: #418123. This means that any package which used xmkmf/imake and had xutils, instead of xutils-dev, for the Build-Depends will now FTBFS.

Re: Mass bug filing: FTBFS because of using imake without Build-Depends on xutils-dev

2008-06-07 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 07:26:05PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote: From the changelog for xorg 1:7.3+11: * Remove the dependency of xutils against xutils-dev, it was only useful for transitional purpose in Etch, closes: #418123. This means that any package which used xmkmf/imake and had