Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 14:10:21 +0100 Matthew Woodcraft wrote: > Phil Hands wrote: > > I saw that at least one package (I'm afraid I've forgotten which) > > settled on this picture of Grace Hooper: > > > > > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ad/Commodore_Grace_M._Hopper%2C_USN_%28

Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

Phil Hands wrote: > I saw that at least one package (I'm afraid I've forgotten which) > settled on this picture of Grace Hooper: > > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ad/Commodore_Grace_M._Hopper%2C_USN_%28covered%29.jpg > It is Public Domain (having been released by the US Navy

Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:23:31PM +0200, Bastien Roucaries wrote: > > Matplotlib use public domaine grâce Hopper > >https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/commit/5da2608950866c9e821177b20b6cfadfd76d3b7a#diff-8f9a4136c7213fb5de70d2a382ed8fbf Here is how I used it for the mgltools-vision packag

Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

Philip Hands writes: > > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ad/Commodore_Grace_M._Hopper%2C_USN_%28covered%29.jpg > > It is Public Domain (having been released by the US Navy). > > It is of a person, so can be used for face recognition. Another advantage: It is richly coloured,

Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

2015-08-12 16:32 GMT+03:00 Andreas Tille : > Any productive suggestion? Take a picture of one of Debian women ? :-)

Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

Andreas Tille writes: > Hi, > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 06:19:39AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: >> ... >> I can totally understand if this kind of thing happening is deterring women >> from working in that field. > > I also understand all these explanations but in Free Software problems > are u

Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Bastien Roucaries wrote: > Un > > Le 13 août 2015 21:38:22 GMT+02:00, Andreas Tille a écrit : >>Hi, >> >>On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 06:19:39AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: >>> ... >>> I can totally understand if this kind of thing happening is deterring >>women >>>

Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

Un Le 13 août 2015 21:38:22 GMT+02:00, Andreas Tille a écrit : >Hi, > >On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 06:19:39AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: >> ... >> I can totally understand if this kind of thing happening is deterring >women >> from working in that field. > >I also understand all these explanation

Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

Hi, On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 06:19:39AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > ... > I can totally understand if this kind of thing happening is deterring women > from working in that field. I also understand all these explanations but in Free Software problems are usually solved by those who see a prob

Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

* Russ Allbery [2015-08-13 06:16]: (...) > Of course, I'm also someone who thinks we should > ignore the conflict between the OpenSSL license and the GPL on the grounds > that it's so widely ignored as to come close to estoppel, and > realistically no one is going to sue. There are some good

Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

Hi, Quoting Adam Borowski (2015-08-13 05:58:09) > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 04:28:37PM -0400, Jack Hill wrote: > > Even if the image were free it is still disparaging to women. From the > > lintian message [0]: "Moreover, Lenna photo has been pointed to as an > > example of sexism in the sciences, r

Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

Adam Borowski writes: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 04:28:37PM -0400, Jack Hill wrote: >> Even if the image were free it is still disparaging to women. From the >> lintian message [0]: "Moreover, Lenna photo has been pointed to as an >> example of sexism in the sciences, reinforcing gender stereotype

Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 04:28:37PM -0400, Jack Hill wrote: > Even if the image were free it is still disparaging to women. From the > lintian message [0]: "Moreover, Lenna photo has been pointed to as an > example of sexism in the sciences, reinforcing gender stereotypes." What exactly is sexist i

Re: Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 21:09 +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: > However, if there is a package that works with face recognition example, > and in this case this replacement is not usable. > After digging a bit through OpenCV, i can now confirm that the Lenna image is used for face feature recognition, a

Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 08:31:04PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > > Any productive suggestion? > > siretart has already provided a suitable replacement in the libav > package: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg > -multimedia/libav.git/commit/tests/reference.pnm?id=b31a3c6f2670d4def5a > a8bd

Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Jakub Wilk wrote: Has anybody asked the copyright holders to release the image under a free license? Or is everybody assuming that they won't? Even if the image were free it is still disparaging to women. From the lintian message [0]: "Moreover, Lenna photo has been point

Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

Quoting Jakub Wilk (2015-08-12 21:57:40) > Has anybody asked the copyright holders to release the image under a > free license? Or is everybody assuming that they won't? From : > While Playboy often cracks down on illegal uses of its material and > did initi

Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

Has anybody asked the copyright holders to release the image under a free license? Or is everybody assuming that they won't? -- Jakub Wilk

Re: Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 20:31 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > > Any productive suggestion? > > siretart has already provided a suitable replacement in the libav > package: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg > -multimedia/libav.git/commit/tests/reference.pnm?id=b31a3c6f2670d4def5a > a8bd3479da9

Re: Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

> Any productive suggestion? siretart has already provided a suitable replacement in the libav package: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg -multimedia/libav.git/commit/tests/reference.pnm?id=b31a3c6f2670d4def5a a8bd3479da9c771ab09e2 Cheers, Fabian signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 16:10 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > Depends on the requirement on those test pictures, but the first thing > that came into my mind is our Debian swirl. Would that do it? > Or maybe we can just create something based on that? > One of the reasons that the Lenna pictures got

Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2015, 15:32 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Gianfranco, > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:17:53AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna > wrote: > > Hi Debian Developers, I would like to let you know I would like to > > do an MBF for ~11 packages > > (not so mass bug filing actually

Re: Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

Hi Gianfranco, On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:17:53AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Debian Developers, I would like to let you know I would like to do an MBF > for ~11 packages > (not so mass bug filing actually) because they use a lena.jpg (or whatever is > called) that is thanks for y

Mass bug filing about non free lena image.

Hi Debian Developers, I would like to let you know I would like to do an MBF for ~11 packages (not so mass bug filing actually) because they use a lena.jpg (or whatever is called) that is non DFSG for Debian. The list of the packages can be seen here [1] and I'm adding it below cl-plplot 0