On 2013-07-04 03:27, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 05:35:35PM +0200, Ondrej Surý wrote:
fabien boucher fabien.dot.bouc...@gmail.com
libjson0-dev : json-c
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjson.so
Also a false positive - this is result of json to json-c library name
Hmm,
I thought that I have fixed this in 0.11-2.
And I am unable to reproduce the bug in current unstable.
Ondrej
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
On 2013-07-04 03:27, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 05:35:35PM +0200, Ondrej Surı wrote:
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org wrote:
Hmm,
I thought that I have fixed this in 0.11-2.
And I am unable to reproduce the bug in current unstable.
libjson0-dev is no longer failing for me either. My release check of
the list did not catch the fixed package - I
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Ian Jackson
ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote:
Shortly, piuparts.debian.org will be elevating the broken symlink test
in sid from a warning to an error status. In advance of that, bugs
submissions are planned against packages which are responsible for
such
Shortly, piuparts.debian.org will be elevating the broken symlink test
in sid from a warning to an error status. In advance of that, bugs
submissions are planned against packages which are responsible for
such links.
I don't think this is a good idea.
These are sometimes triggered
fabien boucher fabien.dot.bouc...@gmail.com
libjson0-dev : json-c
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjson.so
Also a false positive – this is result of json to json-c library name
transition made by upstream and the symlink is kept there to allow programs
to be compiled with -ljson.
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 05:35:35PM +0200, Ondrej Surý wrote:
fabien boucher fabien.dot.bouc...@gmail.com
libjson0-dev : json-c
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjson.so
Also a false positive - this is result of json to json-c library name
transition made by upstream and the
On 2013-06-30 22:46, Dave Steele wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
AFAIK most of these get fixed up by ldconfig, which means they're not a
problem in practice.
It wasn't clear to me how this would be the case, so I reran the logs
with a
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
On 2013-06-30 17:30, Dave Steele wrote:
[...]
...
Debian Orbital Alignment Team pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
eclipse-platform-data : eclipse
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:41:10AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2013-06-30 22:46, Dave Steele wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
AFAIK most of these get fixed up by ldconfig, which means they're not a
problem in practice.
It wasn't
Shortly, piuparts.debian.org will be elevating the broken symlink test
in sid from a warning to an error status. In advance of that, bugs
submissions are planned against packages which are responsible for
such links.
This message covers the bug filings at the 'serious' severity due to a
Policy
On 2013-06-30 17:30, Dave Steele wrote:
[...]
Thanks for working on improving Debian.
Debian Orbital Alignment Team pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
eclipse-platform-data : eclipse
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:30:39 -0400, Dave Steele wrote:
Shortly, piuparts.debian.org will be elevating the broken symlink test
in sid from a warning to an error status. In advance of that, bugs
submissions are planned against packages which are responsible for
such links.
This message
On 2013-06-30 19:08 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:30:39 -0400, Dave Steele wrote:
Shortly, piuparts.debian.org will be elevating the broken symlink test
in sid from a warning to an error status. In advance of that, bugs
submissions are planned against packages which
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
AFAIK most of these get fixed up by ldconfig, which means they're not a
problem in practice.
It wasn't clear to me how this would be the case, so I reran the logs
with a piuparts mod making an ldconfig call before the
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 04:46:28PM -0400, Dave Steele wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
AFAIK most of these get fixed up by ldconfig, which means they're not a
problem in practice.
It wasn't clear to me how this would be the case, so I reran
16 matches
Mail list logo
