On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 10:28:54PM +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi All,
Hi,
> This is a new list for the autopkgtest superficial test.
>
> If the test done in the autopkgtest does not provide significant test
> coverage then it should be marked with "Restrictions: superficial".
> Ref:
> http
Hi All,
On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 10:28 PM Sudip Mukherjee
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> This is a new list for the autopkgtest superficial test.
>
>
> Attached is the dd-list.
Modified dd-list after discussion with the javascript maintainer team.
--
Regards
Sudip
dd-list
Description: Binary data
Hi All,
This is a new list for the autopkgtest superficial test.
If the test done in the autopkgtest does not provide significant test
coverage then it should be marked with "Restrictions: superficial".
Ref:
https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/blob/master/doc/README.package-tests.rst
Hi All,
This is a new list for the autopkgtest superficial test.
If the test done in the autopkgtest does not provide significant test
coverage then it should be marked with "Restrictions: superficial".
Ref:
https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/blob/master/doc/README.package-tests.rst
4 matches
Mail list logo