Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 04:13:55PM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
http://wiki.debian.org/HowToRelease
(which has not been edited since 2009)
If you start linking to the wiki, take the right page:
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseTimetable
Can the other
On 2011-02-01, Simon Paillard spaill...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:34:48PM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
* Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de [110201 21:29]:
squeeze release live microblogging
[..]
Is there a ToDo list of things that need to happen during
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
squeeze release live microblogging
--
The Debian squeeze release will be live microblogged[4] to Debian's
identica account[5]. Several steps of the release process are quite long
and boring, so these quiet periods will be
Hi!
* Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de [110201 21:29]:
squeeze release live microblogging
[..]
Is there a ToDo list of things that need to happen during the release
process, idealy with ETAs? Something that gives an overview without the
distractions of funny and otherwise interesting
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:34:48PM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
* Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de [110201 21:29]:
squeeze release live microblogging
[..]
Is there a ToDo list of things that need to happen during the release
process, idealy with ETAs? Something that gives
On 2010-11-07, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Simon Ruggier simo...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone considered patching the screenshot tools of GNOME or KDE to
include support for automating the process of submitting to
screenshots.debian.org? It would almost
Hi,
On Sun, 07.11.2010 at 11:45:05 +0800, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
Screenshots on packages.d.o
---
You may have noticed that packages.d.o now includes screenshots[1]
with a link to a the Debian screenshots site[2]. Where a screenshot
isn't available a No
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Toni Mueller t...@debian.org wrote:
I guess the majority of packages don't lend themselves to have a
screenshot. All libraries, and many daemons, come to mind. Would it be
possible to exclude the screenshot feature for such packages? It always
takes some time
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 18:42 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Toni Mueller t...@debian.org wrote:
I guess the majority of packages don't lend themselves to have a
screenshot. All libraries, and many daemons, come to mind. Would it be
possible to exclude the
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
Why does the no screenshot available message need to be an image? If
no screenshot is available why not insert the relevant text instead?
Currently packages.d.o does not know if a package has a screenshot or
not. To do
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:42:49PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Some libraries warrant screenshots (GTK+, Qt for example).
The problem is that there is no reliable way to differentiate between
packages that it is appropriate to have a screenshot for and those
that should never have a
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:42:49PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Some libraries warrant screenshots (GTK+, Qt for example).
The Debian Pure Blends web sentinel has this screenshot feature for some
time and we stumbled upon the same question (without having a reasonable
solution). To some extend the
On 2010-11-17, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Toni Mueller t...@debian.org wrote:
I guess the majority of packages don't lend themselves to have a
screenshot. All libraries, and many daemons, come to mind. Would it be
possible to exclude the screenshot
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 07:14:41PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Currently packages.d.o does not know if a package has a screenshot or
not. To do that it would need to regularly download the screenshots
metadata and make use of it. Patches welcome if anyone wants to
implement it.
I have no idea how
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:34:54PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
Some libraries warrant screenshots (GTK+, Qt for example).
I don't really see why these packages warrants screenshots. their look
is fully dependant on the chosen style (and the two mentioned, GTK+ and
Qt can actually look
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:45:22PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 07:14:41PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Currently packages.d.o does not know if a package has a screenshot or
not. To do that it would need to regularly download the screenshots
metadata and make use of it.
On 2010-11-17, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
This argument is true for any application using GTK+ or Qt - would you
conclude that also in this case a screenshot is not warranted? IMHO
No. e.g. seenig the layout of a editor, the structure of a IDE, the
appearance of a instant message
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 12:34 +, Sune Vuorela a écrit :
On 2010-11-17, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
Some libraries warrant screenshots (GTK+, Qt for example).
I don't really see why these packages warrants screenshots. their look
is fully dependant on the chosen style (and
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:21:38PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
[...]
To some extend the problem also exists for several command line
applications.
[...]
To implement this idea we should probably define a reasonable
default xterm to get some consistency and put this information in
the usage
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
On 11/07/2010 05:38 AM, Simon Ruggier wrote:
Hi all, please CC me on any responses, I'm not subscribed to debian-devel.
Has anyone considered patching the screenshot tools of GNOME or KDE to
include support
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Simon Ruggier simo...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone considered patching the screenshot tools of GNOME or KDE to
include support for automating the process of submitting to
screenshots.debian.org?
Hello Simon,
Simon Ruggier schrieb am 07.11.2010 17:19:
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
Please file wishlist bugs on the relevant upstream bug trackers.
I suspect that wouldn't be received very well. I'll file it on debshots
though.
why not? just make it
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Simon Ruggier simo...@gmail.com wrote:
I suspect that wouldn't be received very well. I'll file it on debshots
though.
There isn't much the debshots author can do if upstreams for the
screenshot programs don't want support for uploading screenshots to
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:48:13AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
I suspect that wouldn't be received very well. I'll file it on debshots
though.
There isn't much the debshots author can do if upstreams for the
screenshot programs don't want support for uploading screenshots to
screenshot sites.
Hi all, please CC me on any responses, I'm not subscribed to debian-devel.
Has anyone considered patching the screenshot tools of GNOME or KDE to
include support for automating the process of submitting to
screenshots.debian.org? It would almost certainly cause a big increase
in the number of
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Simon Ruggier simo...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone considered patching the screenshot tools of GNOME or KDE to
include support for automating the process of submitting to
screenshots.debian.org? It would almost certainly cause a big increase
in the number of
26 matches
Mail list logo
