On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 08:53 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > > The primary one I'm unhappy with is its deleting part of the upstream
> > > tarball with (AFAIK) no warning and no control. (That is, if upstream
> > > have a debian dir, it gets nuked, r
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 08:53 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > The primary one I'm unhappy with is its deleting part of the upstream
> > tarball with (AFAIK) no warning and no control. (That is, if upstream
> > have a debian dir, it gets nuked, rather than us collaborating on it).
>
> That's a fea
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 14:25 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >
> > > This wiki page still misses a "Disadvantages of new format"
> > section.
> >
> > It's a wiki, feel free to add it. I know some people unhappy with the
> > new
> > format but I do
On Feb 20, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> source 3.0 (quilt) is still missing tools to make it working out of the box.
> If you quilt not only in debian packages its fucking annoying that you need
> to change to patch of your patches from patches/ to debian/patches depending
> on what you are working on
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 14:25 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > This wiki page still misses a "Disadvantages of new format"
> section.
>
> It's a wiki, feel free to add it. I know some people unhappy with the
> new
> format but I don't know many technical disadvantages.
The primary one I'm unh
Hi Alexander.
Excerpts from Alexander Wirt's message of Sáb Fev 20 10:07:55 -0200 2010:
> Alexander Wirt schrieb am Saturday, den 20. February 2010:
(...)
> > > > >http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0#WhyshouldIconvertmypackageto3.0.28quilt.29format.3F
> > > >
> And the last thing I want to
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri Feb 19, 2010 at 18:51:11 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > > * More than 1000 source packages[4] are already using
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Things would be much easier for starters if dpkg would ship its own patch
> helpers like push, pop and create patch. A 3.0 format which is working out of
> the box without installing quilt and without the need to set QUILT_PATCHES
> would be a real bene
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:25:14 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I don't see any valid reason to convert packages which already use a
> > patch system such as dpatch to the new thing. Debian is in dire need
> > of manpower taking care of our core infrastructure, converting
> > dpatch-based packages to q
Alexander Wirt schrieb am Saturday, den 20. February 2010:
> Mike Hommey schrieb am Saturday, den 20. February 2010:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 09:03:10AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:51:11 +0100, Raphael Hertzog
> > > wrote:
> > > >On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Marc Haber wro
Mike Hommey schrieb am Saturday, den 20. February 2010:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 09:03:10AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:51:11 +0100, Raphael Hertzog
> > wrote:
> > >On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Marc Haber wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wro
Hi,
On Fri Feb 19, 2010 at 18:51:11 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > * More than 1000 source packages[4] are already using the new source
> > > formats "3.0 (quilt)" and "3.0 (na
On Saturday 20 February 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I don't see any valid reason to convert packages which already
> > use a patch system such as dpatch to the new thing. Debian is in
> > dire need of manpower taking care of our core infrastructure,
> > converting dpatch-based packages to quilt is
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 09:03:10AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:51:11 +0100, Raphael Hertzog
> wrote:
> >On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >> > * More than 1000 source packages[4] are already using
Marc Haber writes:
> I don't see any valid reason to convert packages which already use a
> patch system such as dpatch to the new thing. Debian is in dire need
> of manpower taking care of our core infrastructure, converting
> dpatch-based packages to quilt is a total waste of manpower.
This ig
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:51:11 +0100, Raphael Hertzog
wrote:
>On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> > * More than 1000 source packages[4] are already using the new source
>> > formats "3.0 (quilt)" and "3.0 (native)". Have
Joachim Wiedorn writes:
> What is with deactivated watch files, because upsteam is dead?
>
> For a short time I had this case with the package d4x: upstream
> homepage is deleted, there is no more upstream development.
There is also the set of packages where the upstream files are
available, but
Hello,
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> As of the time of writing, DEHS is only 45 watch files away from the
> 1 milestone!. Out of them, only 7480 packages are up to date with
> regard to upstream.
What is with deactivated watch files, because upsteam is dead?
For a short time I had this ca
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> As of the time of writing, DEHS is only 45 watch files away from the
> 1 milestone!. Out of them, only 7480 packages are up to date with
> regard to upstream.
It is worth noting that not all packages need to be kept up to date
with
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > * More than 1000 source packages[4] are already using the new source
> > formats "3.0 (quilt)" and "3.0 (native)". Have you updated your own
> > packages already?
>
> Why should
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> * More than 1000 source packages[4] are already using the new source
> formats "3.0 (quilt)" and "3.0 (native)". Have you updated your own
> packages already?
Why should I?
Greetings
Marc
--
---
21 matches
Mail list logo
