Re: Missing gconf schema

2009-03-23 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 23 mars 2009 à 10:58 -0700, Ludovico Cavedon a écrit : > > Theoretically, any application should work without its schemas > > installed. Upstream considers it a bug otherwise. Practically speaking, > > we are far from there and it’s safer to consider them required. > > > > In all cases, it

Re: Missing gconf schema

2009-03-23 Thread Ludovico Cavedon
2009/3/19 Josselin Mouette : > Le jeudi 19 mars 2009 à 11:12 -0700, Ludovico Cavedon a écrit : >> are application using gconf *required* to have provide a schema? >> In other words, does it make sense to file a bug against applications >> which fail to do so? > > Theoretically, any application shou

Re: Missing gconf schema

2009-03-19 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 19 mars 2009 à 11:12 -0700, Ludovico Cavedon a écrit : > are application using gconf *required* to have provide a schema? > In other words, does it make sense to file a bug against applications > which fail to do so? Theoretically, any application should work without its schemas installed

Missing gconf schema

2009-03-19 Thread Ludovico Cavedon
Hi all, are application using gconf *required* to have provide a schema? In other words, does it make sense to file a bug against applications which fail to do so? IMHO it makes sense, so you can clean no longer useful keys from the gconf db, but I could not find a precise policy about that. Than