Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:37, Maciej Dems escribi:
I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion.
Does the GFDL documentation which currently does not contain any
invariant section have to go to non-free as well?
Yes, until the GFDL is revised,
El Domingo 24 Abril 2005 04:36, Glenn Maynard escribió:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 04:15:28AM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote:
I have a simple question concerning the GFDL
El Domingo 24 Abril 2005 04:39, Adeodato Simó escribió:
* Cesar Martinez Izquierdo [Sun, 24 Apr 2005 04:15:28 +0300]:
El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote:
I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion.
Maciej == Maciej Dems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maciej I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion.
Maciej Does the GFDL documentation which currently does not
Maciej contain any invariant section have to go to non-free as
Maciej well?
It might be better to ask this
El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote:
I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion.
For which the simple answer is:
Read http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml
I have the same question
* Cesar Martinez Izquierdo [Sun, 24 Apr 2005 04:15:28 +0300]:
El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote:
I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion.
For which the simple answer is:
Read
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 04:15:28AM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote:
I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion.
For which the simple answer is:
Read
I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion.
Does the GFDL documentation which currently does not contain any invariant
section have to go to non-free as well?
As I understand the problem, such documentation is free and only can loose
its freeness in the future. But the same can be
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote:
I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion.
For which the simple answer is:
Read http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the
9 matches
Mail list logo