Re: More about GFDL

2005-05-31 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote: El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:37, Maciej Dems escribi: I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion. Does the GFDL documentation which currently does not contain any invariant section have to go to non-free as well? Yes, until the GFDL is revised,

Re: More about GFDL

2005-04-24 Thread Cesar Martinez Izquierdo
El Domingo 24 Abril 2005 04:36, Glenn Maynard escribió: On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 04:15:28AM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote: El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió: On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote: I have a simple question concerning the GFDL

Re: More about GFDL

2005-04-24 Thread Cesar Martinez Izquierdo
El Domingo 24 Abril 2005 04:39, Adeodato Simó escribió: * Cesar Martinez Izquierdo [Sun, 24 Apr 2005 04:15:28 +0300]: El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió: On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote: I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion.

Re: More about GFDL

2005-04-23 Thread Brian May
Maciej == Maciej Dems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maciej I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion. Maciej Does the GFDL documentation which currently does not Maciej contain any invariant section have to go to non-free as Maciej well? It might be better to ask this

Re: More about GFDL

2005-04-23 Thread Cesar Martinez Izquierdo
El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió: On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote: I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion. For which the simple answer is: Read http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml I have the same question

Re: More about GFDL

2005-04-23 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Cesar Martinez Izquierdo [Sun, 24 Apr 2005 04:15:28 +0300]: El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió: On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote: I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion. For which the simple answer is: Read

Re: More about GFDL

2005-04-23 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 04:15:28AM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote: El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió: On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote: I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion. For which the simple answer is: Read

More about GFDL

2005-04-22 Thread Maciej Dems
I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion. Does the GFDL documentation which currently does not contain any invariant section have to go to non-free as well? As I understand the problem, such documentation is free and only can loose its freeness in the future. But the same can be

Re: More about GFDL

2005-04-22 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote: I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion. For which the simple answer is: Read http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the