On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 04:31:50PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:04:23 +0100, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
The convention I've adopted so far for udeb-building packages has been to
install libraries in /usr/lib instead of to /usr/lib/$arch.
Ok, that makes
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:14:07 +0100, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
Yep, looks almost identical to my patch here, with only one difference: the
runtime support packages need to be marked Multi-Arch: foreign in order to
satisfy the dependencies of the multiarch libraries. Attached.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 01:40:41AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:14:07 +0100, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
Yep, looks almost identical to my patch here, with only one difference: the
runtime support packages need to be marked Multi-Arch: foreign in order to
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:54:53 +0100, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
It is with excitement and trepidation that I write to you today about the
status of multiarch support in Debian.
Thanks for the update. I'm afraid I haven't been paying close attention,
Hi Keith,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:02:13PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:54:53 +0100, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
It is with excitement and trepidation that I write to you today about the
status of multiarch support in
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:04:23 +0100, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
The convention I've adopted so far for udeb-building packages has been to
install libraries in /usr/lib instead of to /usr/lib/$arch.
Ok, that makes sense to me. Of course, it's also harder for me to manage
in the
6 matches
Mail list logo
