On Mon, 04 Aug 2003, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > | If libd1 is uploaded and only one of proga and libv0 is recompiled with
> > | libd1 this results in proga linked with both so-versions of the library.
> > | I remember problems with two so-versions of li
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:02:58PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk
>
>
> [...]
>
> | If libd1 is uploaded and only one of proga and libv0 is recompiled with
> | libd1 this results in proga linked with both so-versions of the library.
> | I remember problems with two so-versions o
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | If libd1 is uploaded and only one of proga and libv0 is recompiled with
> | libd1 this results in proga linked with both so-versions of the library.
> | I remember problems with two so-versions of libpng, later with
> | libssl0.9.6 and libssl0.9.7,
* Adrian Bunk
[...]
| If libd1 is uploaded and only one of proga and libv0 is recompiled with
| libd1 this results in proga linked with both so-versions of the library.
| I remember problems with two so-versions of libpng, later with
| libssl0.9.6 and libssl0.9.7, and with libvorbis (at the ti
Hi Chris,
while reading throuch debian-devel archives I read your "libraries being
removed from the archive" mail.
There's at least one good reason why having several so-versions of a
library in unstable is usually a bad idea:
Inter-library dependencies open a _big_ range of sometimes hard to
5 matches
Mail list logo