Re: Multiple so-versions of a lib in unstable are bad

2003-08-04 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003, Florian Weimer wrote: > Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | If libd1 is uploaded and only one of proga and libv0 is recompiled with > > | libd1 this results in proga linked with both so-versions of the library. > > | I remember problems with two so-versions of li

Re: Multiple so-versions of a lib in unstable are bad

2003-08-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:02:58PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > * Adrian Bunk > > > [...] > > | If libd1 is uploaded and only one of proga and libv0 is recompiled with > | libd1 this results in proga linked with both so-versions of the library. > | I remember problems with two so-versions o

Re: Multiple so-versions of a lib in unstable are bad

2003-08-04 Thread Florian Weimer
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | If libd1 is uploaded and only one of proga and libv0 is recompiled with > | libd1 this results in proga linked with both so-versions of the library. > | I remember problems with two so-versions of libpng, later with > | libssl0.9.6 and libssl0.9.7,

Re: Multiple so-versions of a lib in unstable are bad

2003-08-04 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Adrian Bunk [...] | If libd1 is uploaded and only one of proga and libv0 is recompiled with | libd1 this results in proga linked with both so-versions of the library. | I remember problems with two so-versions of libpng, later with | libssl0.9.6 and libssl0.9.7, and with libvorbis (at the ti

Multiple so-versions of a lib in unstable are bad

2003-08-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
Hi Chris, while reading throuch debian-devel archives I read your "libraries being removed from the archive" mail. There's at least one good reason why having several so-versions of a library in unstable is usually a bad idea: Inter-library dependencies open a _big_ range of sometimes hard to