On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:17:12PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I'd be very unhappy about that. For one, I think using such suffix in a
field that forms part of users' everyday's life is, uhm, inappropriate
or disruptive. What do they care if the version is a NMU or not?
Hu? And +dfsg is
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
I want a consistent versioning scheme, thus +nmuX for both native and
non-natives packages.
I'd be very unhappy about that. For one, I think using such suffix in a
field that forms part of users' everyday's life is, uhm, inappropriate
or
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
This DEP is available on the Debian Wiki[1].
The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where X is a
counter starting at 1.
The above was added to the DEP to match dch but dch only uses that format
for native NMUs
(reply-to set to debian-devel only)
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, James Vega wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
This DEP is available on the Debian Wiki[1].
The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where X is a
counter starting at 1.
The
4 matches
Mail list logo
