On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:32:24PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:03:08AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > But why should mount be Essential? It's useless in containers and chroots.
>
> I'm very open to making things non-essential if possible, not limited to
> only m
Hello Adam Borowski,
thanks for your feedback.
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:03:08AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> But why should mount be Essential? It's useless in containers and chroots.
I'm very open to making things non-essential if possible, not limited to
only mount. (Why should bsdutils be
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:03:08AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:18:46AM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > I'm looking for help with ideas about a new package split for the
> > util-linux suite.
> > Currently the main binary packages are:
> > util-linux
> > mount
> >
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:18:46AM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> I'm looking for help with ideas about a new package split for the
> util-linux suite.
>
> Currently the main binary packages are:
> util-linux
> mount
> bsdutils
> (Then there are a bunch of other less important binary packages
Hello!
I'm looking for help with ideas about a new package split for the
util-linux suite.
Currently the main binary packages are:
util-linux
mount
bsdutils
(Then there are a bunch of other less important binary packages also
built.)
All of the three above packages have the Essential: yes contr
5 matches
Mail list logo