Re: New package split of util-linux

2017-07-30 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:32:24PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:03:08AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > But why should mount be Essential? It's useless in containers and chroots. > > I'm very open to making things non-essential if possible, not limited to > only m

Re: New package split of util-linux

2017-07-27 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello Adam Borowski, thanks for your feedback. On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:03:08AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > But why should mount be Essential? It's useless in containers and chroots. I'm very open to making things non-essential if possible, not limited to only mount. (Why should bsdutils be

Re: New package split of util-linux

2017-07-26 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:03:08AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:18:46AM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > I'm looking for help with ideas about a new package split for the > > util-linux suite. > > Currently the main binary packages are: > > util-linux > > mount > >

Re: New package split of util-linux

2017-07-26 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:18:46AM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > I'm looking for help with ideas about a new package split for the > util-linux suite. > > Currently the main binary packages are: > util-linux > mount > bsdutils > (Then there are a bunch of other less important binary packages

New package split of util-linux

2017-07-26 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello! I'm looking for help with ideas about a new package split for the util-linux suite. Currently the main binary packages are: util-linux mount bsdutils (Then there are a bunch of other less important binary packages also built.) All of the three above packages have the Essential: yes contr