On 12/09/2012 05:29, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 22:33:28 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
If the Debian maintainer uses the 3.0 format, the debian/ directory is
magically removed from the upstream tarball anyway.
Right, but it's still annyoing when importing into a VCS.
git
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:20:17 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
If the Debian maintainer uses the 3.0 format, the debian/ directory is
magically removed from the upstream tarball anyway.
Right, but it's still annyoing when importing into a VCS.
git import-orig --filter=debian/ might help.
[Neil Williams]
These are not native packages, they are expressly used by other
distributions than Debian or even Debian derivatives - just because
I'm on the upstream team / am the entire upstream team does NOT mean
that I am justified in polluting the tarball released to RPM users
with
]] Peter Samuelson
[Neil Williams]
These are not native packages, they are expressly used by other
distributions than Debian or even Debian derivatives - just because
I'm on the upstream team / am the entire upstream team does NOT mean
that I am justified in polluting the tarball
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:33:28PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
As long as the debian/ directory is properly maintained, I don't really
see a downside in shipping it upstream.
In the case in question it is a fork of a quite outdated packaging.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 22:33:28 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
If the Debian maintainer uses the 3.0 format, the debian/ directory is
magically removed from the upstream tarball anyway.
Right, but it's still annyoing when importing into a VCS.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Homepage:
[History of thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2012/09/msg00024.html
and following
Please stick to debian-devel when responding - reply-to set]
Hi Charles,
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:30:38PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I answer on debian-med only to avoid adding to the
Le Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:35:25AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:30:38PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
For the packages that I started and on which I am still a major
contributor, I
would like Upstream to include a debian directory in his source tarballs.
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:57:45 +0900
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote:
For the package velvet: I created it. I sometimes use it. I uploaded it 14
times. I met the developer in the real life (5 minutes...). It has been some
time I have been considering switching the source package to
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:34:54AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
Stop being lazy and be a friendly upstream to
non-Debian downstreams.
Charles is not upstream itself - he just gave an advise to upstream to
diverge from what we usually propose and I wanted to check whether our
advise remains valid
Andreas Tille writes (Re: New upstream version of velvet contains debian/
dir):
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:34:54AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
Stop being lazy and be a friendly upstream to
non-Debian downstreams.
Charles is not upstream itself - he just gave an advise to upstream
11 matches
Mail list logo
