Norbert Preining wrote:
> To my reading that thread didn't end in a conclusion that it is not
> acceptable.
>
> Furthermore, IMHO, if it would be *not* acceptable, then we would
> have to remove all, I repeat *ALL* LPPL licensed packages.
>
> I guess this is something we don't want to have in
On Die, 29 Nov 2005, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> Hmm... in that case, I should mention my experience with XyMTeX, an
> organic chemistry LaTeX package included in TeX Live. Anyone else who
> wants to comment on non-DFSG-free components of TeX Live may as well
> follow up to this email.
>
> See Debi
Norbert Preining wrote:
> And if you take a look at the texlive ml at tug.org, I can assure you
> that Karl Berry is very eager in dropping everything from TeX live which
> has the slightest problem with being DFSG free.
Hmm... in that case, I should mention my experience with XyMTeX, an
organic
3 matches
Mail list logo
