Jonathan McDowell nood...@earth.li writes:
* Replacement of the old key with the new one should not cause any
other key to no longer be in Debian's Web of Trust nor strongly
connected subset.
Is there a simple way of checking whether this is true for a given key?
* Replacement of the old
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 07:43:53PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Jonathan McDowell nood...@earth.li writes:
* Replacement of the old key with the new one should not cause any
other key to no longer be in Debian's Web of Trust nor strongly
connected subset.
Is there a simple way of checking
On onsdagen den 20 maj 2009, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
My attitude to this is that yes, people should be considering replacing
their existing GPG keys with something stronger using SHA256 or better
for signatures (and a keysize of greater than 1024 bits).
Hmm, would that mean gpg --enable-dsa2
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 08:50:09PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
Hmm, would that mean gpg --enable-dsa2 --cert-digest-algo SHA256 or
something?
Also, does gpg have an option to make it output the hash algorithms of key
(ID) signatures? I can't seem to find one.
Feed a key to gpg
4 matches
Mail list logo
