On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I'd had the latest hamm versions of libc6 and libc6-dev (2.0.7t-1)
> > installed. I installed the slink version of libc6 (2.0.7u-2) without a
> > hitch. But then I realized I should have been forced to upgrade
> > libc6-dev at the same time!
>
> FWIW, I r
FWIW, I ran into the exact same thing today and apt corrected it.
Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> Wow. I was installing some slink packages today with dpkg on
> my hamm system, and I got myself into a wacky situation.
>
> I'd had the latest hamm versions of libc6 and libc6-dev (2.0.7t-1)
> installed. I i
Wow. I was installing some slink packages today with dpkg on
my hamm system, and I got myself into a wacky situation.
I'd had the latest hamm versions of libc6 and libc6-dev (2.0.7t-1)
installed. I installed the slink version of libc6 (2.0.7u-2) without a
hitch. But then I realized I should have b
3 matches
Mail list logo