On Sat, 2013-12-28 at 08:11 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > The firmware-linux-free maintainer has verified that identical binaries
> > can be built from source, but as you well know not all of the required
> > cross-compilers are packaged in D
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The firmware-linux-free maintainer has verified that identical binaries
> can be built from source, but as you well know not all of the required
> cross-compilers are packaged in Debian.
Does that mean that firmware-linux-free should move to
Dear FTP team,
I would like to help processing the NEW queue.
You can see at the following URL some of the reviews that I did in the past as
part of my "peer review" proposal.
- https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReview
-
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=one-copyright-review;use
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 06:44:41AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> So, shall we contact Lucas to tell him the good news that there is a new
> member
> in the FTP team ?
There's a bit of process and no one gets rights right away.
I'm not the one who makes these decisions, I just work on the team.
Le Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 02:47:46PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit :
>
> We do always look for new members of the ftpteam, please refer to
> Ganneff's postings to all sorts of mailing lists on how to join the team.
> It's quite an important team, and more help is always welcome.
Hi Paul,
if it i
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 12:29:09PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > I would welcome clearer rules to decide what is strictly required to be
> > built
> > from source. In particular, I would welcome something like "The maintainer
> > decide
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I would welcome clearer rules to decide what is strictly required to be built
> from source. In particular, I would welcome something like "The maintainer
> decides, and can be overruled by the Technical Comittee if needed". What
> follows
Hi Raphael,
On Fri, 27 Dec 2013, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
What's unpredictable is that your package might be refused not for the
addition of the NEW binary but for because debian/copyright is not good
enough for current standards of the ftpmasters while it was ok at the time
it got accepted the fi
On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 17:04 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> [Offlist]
Only not...
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> > I would welcome something like "The maintainer
> > decides, and can be overruled by the Technical Comittee if needed".
>
> That is what we have now, as usua
On Fri, 27 Dec 2013, Paul Wise wrote:
> > the unpredictability of when a source package goes to NEW (that is,
> > when the list of binary packages changes),
>
> That is entirely predictable and under the control of the Debian
> package maintainer since it only changes when the maintainer updates
>
[Offlist]
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I would welcome something like "The maintainer
> decides, and can be overruled by the Technical Comittee if needed".
That is what we have now, as usual other contributors will obviously
question decisions made where they consider
Le Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 09:36:33AM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit :
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> > Building as much as possible from source at package build time should
> > be the norm not the exception, otherwise the build process for that
> > source will bitrot and we will n
12 matches
Mail list logo
