Re: PERL: patch for glibc 2.1

1998-10-07 Thread Darren/Torin/Who Ever...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Matt McLean, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote: It's no longer needed. 5.00502 now has a configure test for union semun. Cool. I thought I had seen that but I figured that I'd leave it for people that track that much closer. I know what's going on

Re: PERL: patch for glibc 2.1

1998-10-07 Thread Dan Jacobowitz
On Wed, Oct 07, 1998 at 01:34:42AM -0700, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... wrote: I know what's going on with IPC, and I'm guessing the DBM test is failing because of a bug in the libc. So, what's going on with IPC? IPC until very recently was completely hosed on powerpc. We have hopes that a new

Re: PERL: patch for glibc 2.1

1998-10-06 Thread Darren Stalder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Matt McLean, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote: this is necessary since the semun union is no longer in the libc. its been awhile since your last perl upload, and newer versions have come out.. are you still alive? :-) I thought I'd be able to have

Re: PERL: patch for glibc 2.1

1998-10-06 Thread Matt McLean
On 5 Oct 1998, Darren Stalder wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Matt McLean, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote: this is necessary since the semun union is no longer in the libc. its been awhile since your last perl upload, and newer versions have come out.. are you still

Re: PERL: patch for glibc 2.1

1998-10-06 Thread Dan Jacobowitz
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 05:19:51PM -0700, Darren Stalder wrote: Matt McLean, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote: this is necessary since the semun union is no longer in the libc. its been awhile since your last perl upload, and newer versions have come out.. are you still alive? :-)