Re: packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils

2015-02-14 Thread kamaraju kusumanchi
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Richard Winters r...@mmogp.com wrote: I'm not a 'debian' maintainer or developer...total newbie to alioth - but I'm a c++ developer with over 10 years experience. I'm experienced with linux and more specifically debian development (just not officially).

Re: packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils

2015-02-14 Thread Richard Winters
Hello Kamaraju, Thank you for that information I am checking it out at this time! Best, *Richard B. Winters* On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 10:51 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi raju.mailingli...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Richard Winters r...@mmogp.com wrote: I'm not a

Re: packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils

2015-02-12 Thread Ian Jackson
Jay Berkenbilt writes (packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils): The other two packages are relatively low-effort packages to maintain. The psutils package is dead upstream though there is someone out there who might be interested in taking over upstream. I would introduce him

Re: packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils

2015-02-12 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote: Jay Berkenbilt writes (packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils): The other two packages are relatively low-effort packages to maintain. The psutils package is dead upstream though there is someone out there who might be interested

Re: packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils

2015-02-11 Thread Ondřej Surý
JFTR I sent email to tiff RFA and I am willing to take over it. Thank you, Jay, for all your hardwork on libtiff4-libtiff5 transition (and also for the rest of your packages). If you don't get any volunteers for the rest, please ping here and me again after jessie release (instead of orphaning

Re: packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils

2015-02-11 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org wrote: JFTR I sent email to tiff RFA and I am willing to take over it. Thank you, Jay, for all your hardwork on libtiff4-libtiff5 transition (and also for the rest of your packages). If you don't get any volunteers for the rest, please ping here and me again

Re: packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils

2015-02-11 Thread Richard Winters
Hey there: Posting again because I didn't hit reply-all (sorry, but would rather advertise Im available for help to the whole mailing list.) I'm not a 'debian' maintainer or developer...total newbie to alioth - but I'm a c++ developer with over 10 years experience. I'm experienced with linux

Re: packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils

2015-02-11 Thread Richard Winters
Jay, Thank you for that good sir, I will do just that (I'm sure by the time I wrap my head around orchestrating a transition of ICU to version 54.1; someone would have taken over - and perhaps I'd be able to contribute through them at that time and work my way up to a co/maintainer over time).

Re: packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils

2015-02-11 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Richard Winters r...@mmogp.com wrote: Hey there: Posting again because I didn't hit reply-all (sorry, but would rather advertise Im available for help to the whole mailing list.) I'm not a 'debian' maintainer or developer...total newbie to alioth - but I'm a c++ developer with over 10

packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils

2015-02-11 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
I have four packages that I'd like to give away. If I don't find a new maintainer for them, I may orphan them after jessie is released since I no longer have time to maintain them. I have been maintaining these packages for a long time (over 10 years in some cases), and all four packages are in

Re: a few packages for adoption

2011-05-10 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Jay Berkenbilt q...@debian.org wrote: ** Please reply to me directly (or CC me on replies) as I am not currently subscribed to debian-devel. ** I recently became a father of twins and, as such, have less time to work on packages than I used to.  

a few packages for adoption

2011-05-09 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
** Please reply to me directly (or CC me on replies) as I am not currently subscribed to debian-devel. ** I recently became a father of twins and, as such, have less time to work on packages than I used to. While I do plan on keeping some of my packages, there are others I'm interested

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-09-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-31 07:55]: Still open: * kforth (new Upstream) Can you please file an O: bug? Taken: * festival, speech-tools Franz Pletz Franz, when will you upload? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-06-07 Thread Christoph Haas
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 12:25:27AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: Christoph Haas wrote: Yes, of course. Besides some minor things I don't quite like about Subversion ([...] getting out old revisions of a file means typing the full URL for no reason) svn cat -rrev file_name Oh,

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-06-06 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Christoph Haas wrote: Yes, of course. Besides some minor things I don't quite like about Subversion ([...] getting out old revisions of a file means typing the full URL for no reason) svn cat -rrev file_name works for me... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-31 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, thanks for the numerous offers and replies. I forgot to mention that most (if not all) of these are managed with git. I don't use dpatch or similar tools - managing patches is the SCM's job. The archives mostly are on netz.smurf.noris.de; if your package is not, and you're interested in

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi! You wrote: * videogen (easy pickings) If no one else is interested, I'd like to take this one. It could take me a few weeks to find time to upload though, as Real Life is getting in the way atm. -- Kind regards, ++

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, * NTP server (some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian NTP Team, which consists of zero active members) I'll take it. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread Zak B. Elep
On 5/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am sorry (and not happy with myself) that I've been procrastinating about this for too long. This decision has not been easy. However, I need to focus more on (a) work that actually feeds my kids, and (b) time that is *not* spent hacking.

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread Christoph Haas
Morning... Matthias, your From: line appears to be missing. Or my MUA is b0rked. On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:29:34PM +0200, wrote: * NTP server (some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian NTP Team, which consists of zero active members) I'd take my chance on this

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, Christoph Haas schrieb: * NTP server (some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian NTP Team, which consists of zero active members) I'd take my chance on this one. There is a large number of bugs open and I believe that this package is very important. Still I'd

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread Christoph Haas
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:25:58AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote: Christoph Haas schrieb: * NTP server (some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian NTP Team, which consists of zero active members) I'd take my chance on this one. There is a large number of bugs open

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread Otavio Salvador
Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, Christoph Haas schrieb: * NTP server (some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian NTP Team, which consists of zero active members) I'd take my chance on this one. There is a large number of bugs open and I believe that

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread Christoph Haas
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:09:07AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, Christoph Haas schrieb: * NTP server (some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian NTP Team, which consists of zero active members) I'd take my

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Christoph Haas wrote: Darcs looks like a nice competitor but has some issues regarding checking in changes automatically (might as well be my ignorance but it sounds like I need weird scripts and a .procmailrc to merge changes automatically). You don't *need* them; you can choose to do that,

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:29:34PM +0200, wrote: * libdigest-hmac-perl, libdigest-sha1-perl, libdigest-md2-perl, libdigest-perl, libio-interface-perl, libio-socket-multicast-perl, libnet-xwhois-perl, libvideo-capture-v4l-perl (easy pickings; check for new Upstream) I guess these

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread Hubert Chan
On Mon, 29 May 2006 21:29:34 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Unknown) said: * ufraw (need to package new Upstream; easy) I can take this if nobody else wants it. -- Hubert Chan - email Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.uhoreg.ca/ PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA (Key available at

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:46:30AM -0700, Zak B. Elep wrote: * libdigest-hmac-perl, libdigest-sha1-perl, libdigest-md2-perl, libdigest-perl, libio-interface-perl, libio-socket-multicast-perl, libnet-xwhois-perl, libvideo-capture-v4l-perl I'd like to take these up. Oops, I just saw your

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Christoph Haas wrote: I'm currently looking into several systems. Usually I use Subversion and svn-buildpackage but due to a lot of trouble with svn-buildpackage I have moved away from repositories for my Debian packages lately. Out of curiousity, what problems have you encountered with

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread Andreas Metzler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote: On (29/05/06 21:29), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] * gnutls, gcrypt, libtasn1, libksba (security-critical, some work required, having a team for these packages would

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread Christoph Haas
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:45:10PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Christoph Haas wrote: I'm currently looking into several systems. Usually I use Subversion and svn-buildpackage but due to a lot of trouble with svn-buildpackage I have moved away from repositories for my Debian packages

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread Christoph Haas
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:48:14PM +0200, I (Christoph Haas) wrote: * svn-inject Injecting new packages through svn-inject fails here. I get errors about the MKCOL method not being allowed on the remote WebDAV server. Perhaps it's a problem that the Apache runs on Sarge while I'm developing

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread Daniel Baumann
wrote: * gnulib (easy pickings; need to package new Upstream from CVS, every month or so) I'll take that. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Christoph Haas wrote: Yes, of course. Besides some minor things I don't quite like about Subversion (merging looks like black magic for me and getting out old revisions of a file means typing the full URL for no reason) these are the actual problems I encountered with svn-buildpackage: *

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:29:34PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: * gnulib (easy pickings; need to package new Upstream from CVS, every month or so) I ported quite a lot of C software between IRIX/SunOS/AIX/Linux, so I'll take it. * tcng (some clean-up required) I have some idea about

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-30 Thread Tilman Koschnick
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 20:48 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: * svn-upgrade Upgrading from a new upstream tarball has never worked here. Matthijs Mohlmann and I are maintaining the pdns (PowerDNS) package in a Subversion repository. That software isn't trivial but it's also no rocket science.

Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-29 Thread bounce-debian-devel=archive=mail-archive . com
Hi, My inability to find enough time to focus on package maintainance has been *way* too persistent. I therefore need to give up my packages for adoption, for the time being. I am sorry (and not happy with myself) that I've been procrastinating about this for too long. This decision has not been

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-29 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach [2006.05.29.2129 +0200]: * python-docutils (easy pickings) I'd like to take that on. I am already co-maintainer. Other co-maintainers welcome. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-29 Thread Franz Pletz
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:29:34PM +0200, wrote: * festival, speech-tools (some clean-up work, new major upstream release pending) [..] * gnupg2 (some clean-up work) I'd be interested in taking these three, especially gnupg2 as I'm using it on a daily basis. Thanks, Franz -- Franz

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-29 Thread Eric Dorland
* () wrote: Hi, My inability to find enough time to focus on package maintainance has been *way* too persistent. I therefore need to give up my packages for adoption, for the time being. I am sorry (and not happy with myself) that I've been procrastinating about this for too long

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-29 Thread James Westby
On (29/05/06 21:29), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, My inability to find enough time to focus on package maintainance has been *way* too persistent. I therefore need to give up my packages for adoption, for the time being. That's a shame. * gnutls, gcrypt, libtasn1, libksba (security

Re: Real Life hits: need to give up packages for adoption

2006-05-29 Thread Matthias Klose
* python-imaging (easy pickings) as former maintainer of this package and having used that as an example package, I'd like to maintain this one again. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: {Arch,OCaml,Python,Mono} Packages for Adoption

2005-04-27 Thread Andreas Rottmann
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: tla-tools I can take this one, if noone else wants it. Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint

Re: {Arch,OCaml,Python,Mono} Packages for Adoption

2005-04-27 Thread Miles Bader
Andreas Rottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: tla-tools I can take this one, if noone else wants it. If you do, could you update the debian package to the latest upstream version? Thanks, -Miles -- Next to fried food, the South has suffered most from oratory. -- Walter

Re: {Arch,OCaml,Python,Mono} Packages for Adoption

2005-04-27 Thread John Goerzen
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 11:46:37AM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: tla-tools I can take this one, if noone else wants it. Manoj has also expressed interest; could you coordinate with him? -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: {Arch,OCaml,Python,Mono} Packages for Adoption

2005-04-27 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:10:17 +0900, Miles Bader [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Andreas Rottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: tla-tools I can take this one, if noone else wants it. Sorry for the delay. The new version is in incoming at the moment, and the public archives are visible under

Re: {Arch,OCaml,Python,Mono} Packages for Adoption

2005-04-20 Thread Dave Beckett
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, John Goerzen wrote: Hello, I'm going through the list of packages I'm maintainer for, and found several that I no longer use. Some I've tried to give away long ago, but for whatever reason, never were picked up. I've submitted orphaned versions of all of these and

{Arch,OCaml,Python,Mono} Packages for Adoption

2005-04-19 Thread John Goerzen
Hello, I'm going through the list of packages I'm maintainer for, and found several that I no longer use. Some I've tried to give away long ago, but for whatever reason, never were picked up. I've submitted orphaned versions of all of these and filed appropriate wnpp bugs. [Arch] cscvs

Re: 3 packages for adoption

2003-11-13 Thread Benoit Mortier
Le Mardi 4 Novembre 2003 19:31, Oliver Kurth a écrit : Hi there, I would like to give three of my packages for adoption: [..] memtester i am interested in this one, i will take it have a nice day -- OpenSides sprl Free Software Specialist Benoit Mortier - Linux Engineer pgp1xM00BLDEf.pgp

3 packages for adoption

2003-11-04 Thread Oliver Kurth
Hi there, I would like to give three of my packages for adoption: dumpasn1 This is a useful program if you work with files using the ASN.1 syntax, eg. X.509 cerificates. I needed this in my previous job, but not any more. Upstream is responsive, no bugs. tcpreen This is a sort of proxy

Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread Chanop Silpa-Anan
Hola amigos, Due to my constraints in life, I could not maintain a number of packages properly. So here are packages up for adoption : coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev, libjpeg-mmx-dev, libjpeg-mmx-progs, muttprint, type1inst, freefont

Re: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread Federico Di Gregorio
Il mar, 2002-08-27 alle 14:50, Chanop Silpa-Anan ha scritto: Hola amigos, Due to my constraints in life, I could not maintain a number of packages properly. So here are packages up for adoption : coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev

Re: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi all, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote: Due to my constraints in life, I could not maintain a number of packages properly. So here are packages up for adoption : coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev, libjpeg-mmx-dev, libjpeg-mmx-progs, muttprint

RE: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread STOJICEVIC Edi EXPSIA
Due to my constraints in life, I could not maintain a number of packages properly. So here are packages up for adoption : coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev, libjpeg-mmx-dev, libjpeg-mmx-progs, muttprint, type1inst, freefont

Re: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread Aurlien Beaujean
Le mardi 27 août 2002 à 22:50, Chanop Silpa-Anan écrivait: coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev, libjpeg-mmx-dev, libjpeg-mmx-progs, muttprint, type1inst, freefont, and sharefont. As Rene took muttprint, i took latex2html and i will also

Re: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread Indra Kusuma
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote: # Hola amigos, # # # Due to my constraints in life, I could not maintain a number of packages # properly. So here are packages up for adoption : # # coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, # libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev, libjpeg-mmx

Packages for adoption: dip, sliplogin

1999-10-05 Thread Fabrizio Polacco
HI, due to absolute missing of dial up abilities (I don't even have a fixed line any more :-) I have to orphane two of my packages: dip - I'm crying in orphaning this, as I was putting a lot of care. It's the tool to handle SLIP/PPP connection (both sides), and it was the only one

Re: Packages for adoption

1999-09-16 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Hi. I am now using and prefer the asclassic, and since knghtbrd (the maintainer) and joel (he is another applicant for asclassic) agreed to my succession, I take it over. Thanks. In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph Carter) writes: [1 text/plain; us-ascii

packages for adoption

1999-05-25 Thread Bdale Garbee
I would like to offer the following two packages for adoption or removal: upsd- I don't use it, but others apparently do, and there are no open bugs that I am aware of jaztool - I don't use it, I'm not sure anyone does. Rumor has