Kushal Koolwal wrote:
About 6 months back I had done some extensive benchmarking on real-time kernels
applying RT patch to Debian stock kernel on x86 architecture.
I read about call for help in maintaining,testing debian rt kernel here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-rt-usersm=123808104027590w=2
I
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:05:32PM +0100, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
The problem is an realtime kernel and a proper configuration for music
production. Without that, you better stay away from music production
Not really. I absolutely have no problems with CONFIG_PREEMPT, dynticks,
ondemand
Hi
2009/3/26 Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:05:32PM +0100, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
The problem is an realtime kernel and a proper configuration for music
production. Without that, you better stay away from music production
Not really. I absolutely
I'm trying to follow this thread, but I'm not sure everybody here even
using the same terminology.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:01:22PM +0100, Cassiel wrote:
Hi
2009/3/26 Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:05:32PM +0100, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
The
2009/3/26 Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il
I'm trying to follow this thread, but I'm not sure everybody here even
using the same terminology.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:01:22PM +0100, Cassiel wrote:
Hi
2009/3/26 Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at
Cassiel wrote:
2009/3/26 Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il
mailto:tzaf...@cohens.org.il
I'm trying to follow this thread, but I'm not sure everybody here even
using the same terminology.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:01:22PM +0100, Cassiel wrote:
Hi
2009/3/26
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 03:08:07PM +0100, Cassiel wrote:
When talking about RT kernel only one patch comes into play --
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/
That's a huge patch.
Any idea how much effort would it take to integrae it into the existing
Debian linux-2.6 package?
2009/3/26 Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 03:08:07PM +0100, Cassiel wrote:
When talking about RT kernel only one patch comes into play --
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/
That's a huge patch.
Any idea how much effort would it take to
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Any idea how much effort would it take to integrae it into the existing
Debian linux-2.6 package?
Zero chance. The RT kernel is no plaything. The RT changes are being
slowly fed to the mainline Linux kernel, but due to the complexity, it is an
ongoing
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Any idea how much effort would it take to integrae it into the existing
Debian linux-2.6 package?
Zero chance. The RT kernel is no plaything. The RT changes are being
slowly fed to the mainline Linux kernel, but
2009/3/26 Giacomo A. Catenazzi c...@debian.org
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Any idea how much effort would it take to integrae it into the existing
Debian linux-2.6 package?
Zero chance. The RT kernel is no plaything. The RT changes are
About 6 months back I had done some extensive benchmarking on real-time kernels
applying RT patch to Debian stock kernel on x86 architecture.
I read about call for help in maintaining,testing debian rt kernel here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-rt-usersm=123808104027590w=2
I will be glad to offer
Andreas Tille wrote:
After reading the documentation, I still don't know if a blend is useful for
us. Blends seem to be some kind of cooler tasks, is that true?
Well, the terminology was taken over from tasksel at some former point
in time - but it is a little bit more.
Could you elaborate
Hi,
Now we're talking about improving Debian for multimedia, realtime
kernels and the like, I thought let's make some work on more things to
overcome some dissadvantages of Debian for audio production compared to
other distro's.
Why is such a core app and also beautiful app as Ardour is,
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 12:58 +0100, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Why is such a core app and also beautiful app as Ardour is, not even in
Debian stable or testing? This is a big problem imo and it should be
solved as soon as possible. I can't imagine that there is a real
problem, cause I know
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Could you elaborate a bit? From what I gather (after reading the docs and
skipping through the pages you have referenced), all I see are tasks (enhanced
with metapackages with Recommends), and a nice web frontend. I'm pretty sure
I'm missing something
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
I read this on the Debian multimedia mailinglist:
Unfortunately lenny was already freezed by that time, and although
both of the above updates were really safe (IMO) and despite all the
efforts I and especially Reinhard put into convincing the release
managers, we are
2009/3/25 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 12:58 +0100, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Why is such a core app and also beautiful app as Ardour is, not even in
Debian stable or testing? This is a big problem imo and it should be
solved as soon as possible. I can't imagine
taste they need to be informed what to choose from. It's like a
restaurant
where you choose from a menu. Currently we are lacking a complete
multimedia
menu in Debian.
An menu entry for multimedia sounds good to me
(Ubuntu has an menu entry for 'multimedia production:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
taste they need to be informed what to choose from. It's like a restaurant
where you choose from a menu. Currently we are lacking a complete
multimedia
menu in Debian.
An menu entry for multimedia sounds good to me
(Ubuntu has an menu entry for
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
taste they need to be informed what to choose from. It's like a
restaurant
where you choose from a menu. Currently we are lacking a complete
multimedia
menu in Debian.
An menu entry for multimedia sounds good to me
(Ubuntu
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Nothing against this but I used the term menu in a different than this
technical meaning. I hope this became clear in my mail.
That was clear, but it bumped up a old idea I had in my head ;)
Please take that idea serious...
To whom do you
Jim wrote:
Grammostola Rosea,
I want also to direct your attention to the kernel, as it has the
possibility to be more supportive of those specific needs, by having
low latency and real-time extensions patched and enabled. The debian
folks (especially waldi aka Bastien Blank will say some or
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Grammostola Rosea
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
Mmh this is interesting, cause there is an realtime kernel available in the
ubuntu hardy repo, but not in Debian yet. Would be nice if there was one
which users could install. But I'm not an rt-kernel expert
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, Jim wrote:
Hi. I took the suggestion of one of the replies to your original post
and read about debian pure blends, and at first I thought demudi was a
pure blend;
At the time of writing the DeMuDi project *intended* to become 100%
Debian - but
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Felipe Sateler wrote:
The DeMuDi project is dead AFAIK.
This fits to my observation.
The 64studio spawned from it, and can't be a
pure blend. Actually the demudi team merged with the Debian Multimedia
Maintainers, so we now work together.
That's really good.
I would
Grammostola Rosea,
Hi. I took the suggestion of one of the replies to your original post
and read about debian pure blends, and at first I thought demudi was a
pure blend; it's listed as one of the projects but is not actually a
pure blend, which I guess means they might have updated apps and
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, Jim wrote:
Hi. I took the suggestion of one of the replies to your original post
and read about debian pure blends, and at first I thought demudi was a
pure blend;
At the time of writing the DeMuDi project *intended* to become 100%
Debian - but this intend was not
Michael Hanke wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 04:29:35PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
As an additional hint the multimedia team might consider using the Debian Pure
Blends framework which enables them to show quite simply what is just there and
what they are working on (for instance
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Speaking for the pkg-multimedia-maintainers, i.e. the actual Debian
Multimedia Team, we don't see ourself as a Debian Blend. We are just a
bunch of maintainers maintaining a bunch of packages *in* Debian:
Right, and that is what blends are about
Hi,
Since a while I'm pretty active in using Debian/Linux for Multimedia
production, especially focusing on music production (check
www.linuxmusicians.com for instance).
Debian is a great system to use for this. Unfortunately there are
nice music production applications which are not
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
For instance, I posted some apps which are not in Debian right now as wishes
(RFP):
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?submitter=rosea.grammost...@gmail.com
(There is work on progress on Frescobaldi, Rumor (my first Debian package ;)
)
As an additional hint the multimedia team might consider using the Debian Pure
Blends framework which enables them to show quite simply what is just there and
what they are working on (for instance see just issued bits [1]). So if you
are interested in those tasks and bugs pages or in multimedia
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 04:29:35PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
As an additional hint the multimedia team might consider using the Debian
Pure
Blends framework which enables them to show quite simply what is just there
and
what they are working on (for instance see just issued bits
34 matches
Mail list logo
