Re: PoC: cross-init-bridge

2014-02-18 Thread Ian Jackson
Christian Seiler writes ("PoC: cross-init-bridge"): > 1. Is there any interest in at least the current version of the > cross-init-bridge? If so, I'll add a proper build system, fix the known > quirks/bugs, call that "0.1" and make a debian package out of it. (I&#

Re: PoC: cross-init-bridge

2014-02-17 Thread Christian Seiler
[Petter Reinholdtsen] > Have you consider the /lib/init/init-d-script approach now available > in unstable when considering how hard it is to maintain init.d > scripts? It allow package maintainers to only store the package > specific parts in their init.d scripts, and offload the complete > imple

Re: PoC: cross-init-bridge

2014-02-16 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Christian Seiler] > Hi there, Hi. > Also, systemd does not run on non-Linux ports and will most likely not > run on those anytime soon, if Debian wants to support those, they will > have to make due with another init system. Currently, the only > contenders for those ports are sysvinit and OpenR

PoC: cross-init-bridge

2014-02-16 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi there, (CC Steve Langsek, since he's maintainer/developer (?) of Upstart.) (I'm not on the debian-devel list, so please use reply to all.) People, especially in the TC, have criticized that there are different protocols for systemd and upstart to specify things such as notifications and/or soc