Re: Bug#857394: Debian Policy violation -- libgegl-dev contains duplicate copy of openCL library files

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > On 14.04.2017 14:34, ian_br...@mail.ru wrote: > [...] > By the way: is there any automatic way for creating the -dfsg trees out > of the upstream ? (I prefer working directly w/ git repos instead

Re: Bug#857394: Debian Policy violation -- libgegl-dev contains duplicate copy of openCL library files

On 14.04.2017 14:34, ian_br...@mail.ru wrote: > I was right -- it IS a Debian Policy violation: > > * 4.13 Convenience copies of code * I've got a similar problem while packaging recent webkit (latest surf needs a newer one). Their git repo is >GB (!). No idea how much I'll hav

Re: Bug#857394: Debian Policy violation -- libgegl-dev contains duplicate copy of openCL library files

Control: reopen -1 Control: found -1 gegl/0.3.8-3 Hi Ian. On 2017-04-14 at 05:34 (-0700), ian_br...@mail.ru wrote: > I was right -- it IS a Debian Policy violation: > > * 4.13 Convenience copies of code * > > Some software packages include in their distribution convenien

Re: Bug#857394: Debian Policy violation -- libgegl-dev contains duplicate copy of openCL library files

On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 01:25:29 -0700 <ian_br...@mail.ru> wrote: >> I'm not going to try a 'merge-on-the-fly' on headers to save a bunch >> of kilobytes. Sorry. > > Saving a bunch of kilobytes is really not the issue, as I suggested > when I said "isn't that a

Re: [Pkg-cups-devel] cupsddk - stolen WNPP - policy violation

Hi Patrick, Patrick Ringl [2008-04-21 3:46 +0200]: I am concerned about 'cupsddk' which recently passed NEW. On 25th of march I contacted pkg-cups for joining the team and working on cupsddk [1] since I am about to repackage 'splix' (a driver for samsung laser printers). Martin Pitt did

Re: [Pkg-cups-devel] cupsddk - stolen WNPP - policy violation

/msg00043.html You didn't change the RFP to an ITP and the WNPP is full of people who haven't issued an ITP and say they will but then never do anything. Policy states you should change the WNPP bug to ITP, which you didn't, so there has been no policy violation. But you are free to assist

Re: [Pkg-cups-devel] cupsddk - stolen WNPP - policy violation

Hello Martin, Martin Pitt wrote: Hi Patrick, Patrick Ringl [2008-04-21 3:46 +0200]: I am concerned about 'cupsddk' which recently passed NEW. On 25th of march I contacted pkg-cups for joining the team and working on cupsddk [1] since I am about to repackage 'splix' (a driver for samsung

Re: [Pkg-cups-devel] cupsddk - stolen WNPP - policy violation

to an ITP and the WNPP is full of people who haven't issued an ITP and say they will but then never do anything. Policy states you should change the WNPP bug to ITP, which you didn't, so there has been no policy violation. But you are free to assist with the package in what ever way you can. All

Re: [Pkg-cups-devel] cupsddk - stolen WNPP - policy violation

Hi Patrick, Patrick [2008-04-21 17:55 +0200]: You have not _explicitely refused it - but you didnt add me either. Oh, that might have been the point of confusion. I am an administrator for the cupsys package alioth project, but you didn't state that you wanted to work on cupsys itself (and,

Re: [Pkg-cups-devel] cupsddk - stolen WNPP - policy violation

[removing non-related maillists and recipients, this is a purely devel comment] Patrick wrote: Till did never deal with my correspondence so far, which is why I think he should not maintain it - apart from that I am a CDBS fan, and things look far cleaner than with his debian/rules. A bit of

Re: [Pkg-cups-devel] cupsddk - stolen WNPP - policy violation

On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:36:37PM +1000, Mark Purcell wrote: But you are free to assist with the package in what ever way you can. All contributions are welcome. Patrick, as you see you are clearly welcome. So please cool down and submit patches :) Perhaps in the longer term we could

cupsddk - stolen WNPP - policy violation

Hello, I am concerned about 'cupsddk' which recently passed NEW. On 25th of march I contacted pkg-cups for joining the team and working on cupsddk [1] since I am about to repackage 'splix' (a driver for samsung laser printers). Martin Pitt did not accept my request for NO reason and told me

Re: cupsddk - stolen WNPP - policy violation

Patrick Ringl wrote: But - back to the actual topic: Is this common sense in debian? Not respecting responses to WNPP's and even ignoring volunteers work? I am gutted! It is common practice to retitle the RFP (request for packaging) to ITP (intend to package) and changing the owner of

Policy Violation

The following message sent by this account has violated system policy: From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 11:17:53 -0400 Subject: Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED]) The following violations were detected: --- Scan information follows ---