Re: [External] Re: Populating non-free firmware?

2023-01-04 Thread Mark Pearson
On 2022-12-25 13:21, Jonathan Carter wrote: > Hi Bastian > > On 2022/12/25 13:32, Bastian Blank wrote: >> AFAIK this requires a re-upload.  However, does the installer properly >> include it yet?  I need to check that. >> >> I can handle the main firmware packages maintained by the kernel team. > >

Re: Populating non-free firmware?

2022-12-31 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, Dec 25, 2022, at 15:21, Jonathan Carter wrote: > So if we're going with maintainers-are-going-to-do-the-uploads, then > taking a cursory glance at what's left that seems important is: > > - firmware-sof-signed (maintainer: Mark Pearson) > - intel-microcode (maintainer: Henrique de Mora

Re: Populating non-free firmware?

2022-12-25 Thread Jonathan Carter
Hi Bastian On 2022/12/25 13:32, Bastian Blank wrote: AFAIK this requires a re-upload. However, does the installer properly include it yet? I need to check that. I can handle the main firmware packages maintained by the kernel team. Great! That covers a large percentage of them (and even mos

Re: Populating non-free firmware?

2022-12-25 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 11:44:49AM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > Will the archive team be moving those over? Is it up to firmware packagers > to re-upload it to the correct component? AFAIK this requires a re-upload. However, does the installer properly include it yet? I need to check that. I

Re: Populating non-free firmware?

2022-12-25 Thread Philipp Kern
On 25.12.22 00:31, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: The problem is a logistics one: the archives need to be split up, there needs to be a transition plan, maybe the easiest way is to do NMU uploads This is what (archive) overrides were invented for. However with the split maybe it'd be good for dak to

Re: Populating non-free firmware?

2022-12-24 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 03:22:17PM -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 12:15 PM M. Zhou wrote: > > > On Sat, 2022-12-24 at 11:44 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > > > > > > The non-free-firmware [component] has been created, but so far it > > > only > > > contains the rasb

Re: Populating non-free firmware?

2022-12-24 Thread Timothy M Butterworth
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 12:15 PM M. Zhou wrote: > On Sat, 2022-12-24 at 11:44 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > > > > The non-free-firmware [component] has been created, but so far it > > only > > contains the rasbpi-firmware package. > > Please ensure to include the packages for wifi cards, especi

Re: Populating non-free firmware?

2022-12-24 Thread M. Zhou
On Sat, 2022-12-24 at 11:44 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > > The non-free-firmware [component] has been created, but so far it > only > contains the rasbpi-firmware package. Please ensure to include the packages for wifi cards, especially the iwlwifi since I don't use desktop pc. One of the mo

Populating non-free firmware?

2022-12-24 Thread Jonathan Carter
Hi Debianites Earlier this year, we had a [vote] where we concluded that we'd include non-free firmware in the upcoming Debian 12 release. Steve posted a summary of [next steps] to this list, but it seems like we have some steps missing. The non-free-firmware [component] has been created, bu