Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 03:44, Miles Bader wrote:
Juergen Salk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
According to their package descriptions, we seem to have exactly
six powerful text editors in Debian. These are elvis, jove,
mined, ne, nedit and zed.
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
So vim is in the simple, for newbies class?
No, there's actually three classes: Simple editors for newbies,
not-so-simple but, er, powerful editors, and religions.
ae is the religion variety.
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 03:44, Miles Bader wrote:
Juergen Salk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
According to their package descriptions, we seem to have exactly
six powerful text editors in Debian. These are elvis, jove,
mined, ne, nedit and zed. Emacs, vim and many others do not
belong to
Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You're right in general, but there actually seems to be a fairly
distinct divide in editors, between simple editors for newbs and
not-so-simple but, er, powerful editors
So vim is in the simple, for newbies class?
Naw, it just needs powerful added
Juergen Salk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
According to their package descriptions, we seem to have exactly
six powerful text editors in Debian. These are elvis, jove,
mined, ne, nedit and zed. Emacs, vim and many others do not
belong to them. Does that mean these are less powerful than the
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 03:28:27PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 23:52 +0100, Juergen Salk wrote:
I am just wondering if we shouldn't be more chary of using
meaningless (or soliciting) phrases like powerful in
package descriptions in general.
Sounds like something
* Vincent Fourmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060107 14:13]:
Description : tioga : a powerful plotting system in ruby
First of all: This is not against you, Vincent. :-)
I am just wondering if we shouldn't be more chary of using
meaningless (or soliciting) phrases like powerful in
package
On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 23:52 +0100, Juergen Salk wrote:
I am just wondering if we shouldn't be more chary of using
meaningless (or soliciting) phrases like powerful in
package descriptions in general.
Sounds like something that should be added to lintian. I suggest filing
a wishlist bug with
8 matches
Mail list logo