[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently there are several packages which Build-Depend on netbase just to
have /etc/protocol and /etc/services available to run tests. Unfortunately,
this means that all of netbase's dependencies also need to be installed --
and because of bug #162581, pbuilder
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
In fact, this would solve in a certain sense the long argument about how many
protocols/services to include in the lists: alternate packages could
Provides: netbase-data if they included any superset of the most basic list.
In this way, I dare say, lies madness. Not
[Anthony DeRobertis]
If there is really a problem with not being able to include
everything in netkit-data or whatever, we need an update-services
command, etc.
/etc/services.d (:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Currently there are several packages which Build-Depend on netbase just to
have /etc/protocol and /etc/services available to run tests. Unfortunately,
this means that all of netbase's dependencies also need to be installed --
and because of bug #162581, pbuilder can't even block inetd from
On Feb 03, Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'd like to propose moving those data files from netbase to base-files.
If
No. The correct solution is to fix netbase by moving update-inetd to
each *inetd package.
But aj does not want to do this until update-inetd will have been
Le Vendredi 03 Février 2006 13:30, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
On Feb 03, Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'd like to propose moving those data files from netbase to
base-files. If
No. The correct solution is to fix netbase by moving update-inetd to
each *inetd package.
But aj
On Feb 03, Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're suggesting that with a move of update-inetd then netbase would
become more like the netbase-data I was suggesting as an alternative, with
minimal dependencies, that would be fine with me.
Yes, because only the files in /etc/ would
[Daniel Schepler]
If you're suggesting that with a move of update-inetd then netbase
would become more like the netbase-data I was suggesting as an
alternative, with minimal dependencies, that would be fine with me.
[Marco d'Itri]
Yes, because only the files in /etc/ would be left.
On Feb 03, Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not quite what he asked. He mentioned with minimal
dependencies. Currently netbase provides a basic networking
The dependencies list would be much shortened too.
I think it's useful to keep this property (and the dependencies on
I
9 matches
Mail list logo
