On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 20:37:06 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Guillem Jover writes:
> > What you actually want here is to use architecture wildcards, as in:
> >
> > libasound2-dev [linux-any]
> >
> > this is documented in dpkg-architecture(1), and has been supported since
> > dpkg 1.13.13. debhe
Guillem Jover writes:
> What you actually want here is to use architecture wildcards, as in:
>
> libasound2-dev [linux-any]
>
> this is documented in dpkg-architecture(1), and has been supported since
> dpkg 1.13.13. debhelper also supports this since 5.0.36. Currently the
> only missing pi
Hi!
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 09:30:48 +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Introduction of the new fields
> ==
>
> - Build-Recommends would list packages that are basically available in
> the Debian archive, but are not available on all architectures or for
> all kernels. [...
Hi Fabian!
Am Dienstag, den 10.02.2009, 13:25 +0100 schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
> Steve Langasek schrieb:
> > This is a very bad idea. It interferes with reproducibility of binary
> > builds, which is a very important property of Debian packages. Packages
> > must *not* build differently based on
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:25:53 +0100
Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Steve Langasek schrieb:
> > This is a very bad idea. It interferes with reproducibility of binary
> > builds, which is a very important property of Debian packages. Packages
> > must *not* build differently based on opportunistic disc
Steve Langasek schrieb:
This is a very bad idea. It interferes with reproducibility of binary
builds, which is a very important property of Debian packages. Packages
must *not* build differently based on opportunistic discovery of
build-dependencies on the system - it's a bug for any package to
Le Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 09:30:48AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath a écrit :
> Dear -devel,
>
> I'd like to suggest the introduction of two new control fields to the
> source stanza of debian/control, namely Build-Recommends and
> Build-Suggests.
Dear Fabian,
this is a very intersting proposal that would
On 09/02/09 at 01:13 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Feb 2009, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> > - Build-Recommends would list packages that are basically available
> > in the Debian archive, but are not available on all architectures or
> > for all kernels.
>
> Unfortunatly, making missing bui
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 01:13:24AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Why have I added libfaad-dev to the Build-Recommends? Because in
> > Ubuntu ffmpeg-debian is in the main section, while faad2 is not. So
> > in order to merge ffmpeg-debian to Ubuntu, the maintainer has to
> > manually remove this B
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 09:30:48AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Dear -devel,
> I'd like to suggest the introduction of two new control fields to the
> source stanza of debian/control, namely Build-Recommends and
> Build-Suggests.
This is a very bad idea. It interferes with reproducibility of
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> - Build-Recommends would list packages that are basically available
> in the Debian archive, but are not available on all architectures or
> for all kernels.
Unfortunatly, making missing build-dependencies a non-fatal error
causes builds to be non-det
Dear -devel,
I'd like to suggest the introduction of two new control fields to the
source stanza of debian/control, namely Build-Recommends and
Build-Suggests.
Introduction of the new fields
==
- Build-Recommends would list packages that are basically available in
t
12 matches
Mail list logo
