On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:12:29 + (UTC), Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> 23-09-2007, Manoj Srivastava: []
It doesn't catch files created by Maintainer scripts?
>>
>>> This is the design flaw in those scripts (even in whole package
>>> management).
>>
>> I am not sure you have made
"Ken Spath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Proposal regarding future packaging:
>
> Add an additional manual page to new/future/updated packages that is
> the same as the package name. IF and only IF there would NOT be a
> conflict with an existant necessary manual p
23-09-2007, Manoj Srivastava:
[]
>>> It doesn't catch files created by Maintainer scripts?
>
>> This is the design flaw in those scripts (even in whole package
>> management).
>
> I am not sure you have made your case here.
>
> Currently, using maintainer scripts, it is indeed possi
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:25:23 + (UTC), Oleg Verych (Gmane) <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
> 19-09-2007, Bruce Sass: []
>>> > I like this too. Finding what a package has just installed is one
>>> > of the biggest holes in Debian right now, IMO. I have to use dpkg
>>> > -L to figure this out, and th
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 03:46:26 -0600, Bruce Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat September 22 2007 12:16:18 am Oleg Verych (Gmane) wrote:
>> 21-09-2007, Bruce Sass:
>> > On Thu September 20 2007 09:25:23 pm Oleg Verych (Gmane) wrote:
>> >> 19-09-2007, Bruce Sass:
>> >> > I'm hoping the dpkg "tri
On Sat September 22 2007 12:16:18 am Oleg Verych (Gmane) wrote:
> 21-09-2007, Bruce Sass:
> > On Thu September 20 2007 09:25:23 pm Oleg Verych (Gmane) wrote:
> >> 19-09-2007, Bruce Sass:
> >> > I'm hoping the dpkg "triggers" functionality Ian Jackson has
> >> > been working on will help solve that
21-09-2007, Bruce Sass:
> On Thu September 20 2007 09:25:23 pm Oleg Verych (Gmane) wrote:
>> 19-09-2007, Bruce Sass:
>> > I'm hoping the dpkg "triggers" functionality Ian Jackson has been
>> > working on will help solve that wart though.
>>
>> How exactly?
>
> Exactly? I don't know. I haven't follo
On Thu September 20 2007 09:25:23 pm Oleg Verych (Gmane) wrote:
> 19-09-2007, Bruce Sass:
> > I'm hoping the dpkg "triggers" functionality Ian Jackson has been
> > working on will help solve that wart though.
>
> How exactly?
Exactly? I don't know. I haven't followed what is happening close
enoug
19-09-2007, Bruce Sass:
[]
>> > I like this too. Finding what a package has just installed is one
>> > of the biggest holes in Debian right now, IMO. I have to use dpkg
>> > -L to figure this out, and that's just too crude to be a real
>> > solution.
>>
>> Too crude? That's a simple command, easil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Goerzen wrote:
[...]
> Too crude? That's a simple command, easily found in a relevant manpage. In
> true Unix fashion, its output can be easily piped to other commands. What's
> crude about it?
Well, it doesn't actually tell me what I need t
On Wed September 19 2007 04:53:10 pm John Goerzen wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 September 2007 5:43:03 pm David Given wrote:
> > John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > > I like this idea, especially if there were a short description
> > > about each program and relevent configuration files.
> >
>
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 5:43:03 pm David Given wrote:
> John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> [...]
>
> > I like this idea, especially if there were a short description about
> > each program and relevent configuration files.
>
> I like this too. Finding what a package has just installed is one of t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
[...]
> I like this idea, especially if there were a short description about each
> program and relevent configuration files.
I like this too. Finding what a package has just installed is one of the
biggest holes in Debian
John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> Ken Spath wrote:
>> Proposal regarding future packaging:
>>
>> Add an additional manual page to new/future/updated packages that is
>> the same as the package name. IF and only IF there would NOT be a
>> conflict with an existant nece
Ken Spath wrote:
> Proposal regarding future packaging:
>
> Add an additional manual page to new/future/updated packages that is
> the same as the package name. IF and only IF there would NOT be a
> conflict with an existant necessary manual page AND IF there is no
> binary in
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:27:12 +0200
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Dienstag 18 September 2007 schrieb Ken Spath:
> > If after I install casu or netdiag, I type man casu or man netdiag
> > there is nothing.
> >
> > whereis / find / apt-cache search / apt-file search were necessary
Am Dienstag 18 September 2007 schrieb Ken Spath:
> If after I install casu or netdiag, I type man casu or man netdiag
> there is nothing.
>
> whereis / find / apt-cache search / apt-file search were necessary
>
> How many current debian users and users of forked distributions know
> of apt-file o
Proposal regarding future packaging:
Add an additional manual page to new/future/updated packages that is
the same as the package name. IF and only IF there would NOT be a
conflict with an existant necessary manual page AND IF there is no
binary in a package that is the same as the package name
18 matches
Mail list logo
