Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Besides of what Stephen Gran already said on his message I believe
>> there's no chance of NMU's to take place if the bugs aren't reported :).
>
> I would never NMU just to correct an harmless rpath. Thus if I NMU such a
> p
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Besides of what Stephen Gran already said on his message I believe there's
> no chance of NMU's to take place if the bugs aren't reported :).
I would never NMU just to correct an harmless rpath. Thus if I NMU such a
package, it's because of something
Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stephen Gran wrote:
>> (also, linitan.d.o seems down at the moment, but that's another issue).
> That's because lintian.d.o's lintian package was upgraded and the archive
> (i386+source) is being checked.
And also I screwed up something with the new
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 19:38:55 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>>
>> > If no one objects I'll start MBF within a week or, if encouraged to and
>> > with no objection, probably during the week.
>> >
>> Do we really need a mas
Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Raphael Geissert said:
>> More than one month ago I posted a list[1] of packages defining useless
>> rpath's on amd64 based on an archive wide lintian check.
>
> [...]
>
>> If no one objects I'll start MBF within a week or, if encouraged to and
>
This one time, at band camp, Raphael Geissert said:
> More than one month ago I posted a list[1] of packages defining useless
> rpath's on amd64 based on an archive wide lintian check.
[...]
> If no one objects I'll start MBF within a week or, if encouraged to and with
> no objection, probably
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 19:38:55 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>
> > If no one objects I'll start MBF within a week or, if encouraged to and
> > with
> > no objection, probably during the week.
> >
> Do we really need a mass bug filing for every sin
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 19:38:55 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> If no one objects I'll start MBF within a week or, if encouraged to and with
> no objection, probably during the week.
>
Do we really need a mass bug filing for every single lintian check out
there? I don't think this achieves an
Hello everybody,
[Please respect the Reply-To header]
More than one month ago I posted a list[1] of packages defining useless
rpath's on amd64 based on an archive wide lintian check.
I just finished an other archive wide lintian check in order to track the
progress made on the subject. Here are
9 matches
Mail list logo
