On 2022-09-15 Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2022, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> > A successful build is no guarantee for a working packaging though. e.g.
> > hugin errs out immediately when built with the newer wxWidgets.
> That is certainly true - and probably another good reason we
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 16:00:32 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> > libalien-wxwidgets-perl (.69+dfsg-4 uploaded to experimental.
> >
> > Next step: check what libwx-perl [0] says and do a binNMU or sourceful
> > upload (it needs to switch from wxperl-gtk-3-0-5-uni-gcc-3-4 to
> >
On Thu, 15 Sep 2022, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2022-09-13 Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi,
wxWidgets 3.2 (a new API/ABI stable release) has been released a few months
ago and is now packaged in unstable as wxwidgets3.2. Upstream has stopped
supporting wxWidgets 3.0, so the Debian wx team would
On 2022-09-13 Scott Talbert wrote:
> Hi,
> wxWidgets 3.2 (a new API/ABI stable release) has been released a few months
> ago and is now packaged in unstable as wxwidgets3.2. Upstream has stopped
> supporting wxWidgets 3.0, so the Debian wx team would like to migrate all wx
> package users to
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2022 22:32:23 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
wxWidgets 3.2 (a new API/ABI stable release) has been released a few months
ago and is now packaged in unstable as wxwidgets3.2. …
For most packages, the transition should be as simple as
On Mon, 12 Sep 2022 22:32:23 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> wxWidgets 3.2 (a new API/ABI stable release) has been released a few months
> ago and is now packaged in unstable as wxwidgets3.2. …
> For most packages, the transition should be as simple as changing
> Build-Depends from
On Tue, 13 Sep 2022, Simon McVittie wrote:
For most libraries, the deciding factor would be: are library users
expected to find the library via a single pkg-config file that cannot
coexist with the other version (like libpng's libpng.pc and OpenSSL's
libssl.pc/libcrypto.pc/openssl.pc), or do
On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 at 19:55:01 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> For most libraries, the deciding factor would be: are library users
> expected to find the library via a single pkg-config file that cannot
> coexist with the other version (like libpng's libpng.pc and OpenSSL's
>
On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 at 13:52:11 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> Major wxWidgets releases are not API compatible, so there will be packages
> that will require changes (although there are not many
> backwards-incompatible API changes between 3.0 and 3.2). I would think of
> it more akin to GTK-2 vs
On Tue, 13 Sep 2022, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 10:32:23PM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
wxWidgets 3.2 (a new API/ABI stable release) has been released a few months
ago and is now packaged in unstable as wxwidgets3.2. Upstream has stopped
supporting wxWidgets 3.0, so the
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 10:32:23PM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> wxWidgets 3.2 (a new API/ABI stable release) has been released a few months
> ago and is now packaged in unstable as wxwidgets3.2. Upstream has stopped
> supporting wxWidgets 3.0, so the Debian wx team would like to migrate all wx
>
Hi,
wxWidgets 3.2 (a new API/ABI stable release) has been released a few
months ago and is now packaged in unstable as wxwidgets3.2. Upstream has
stopped supporting wxWidgets 3.0, so the Debian wx team would like to
migrate all wx package users to wxwidgets3.2 for bullseye, with the plan
to
12 matches
Mail list logo
