Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 11:12:29AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 at 11:12:54 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:36:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Specifically, the plan is that any package in wheezy shipping
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:36:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Specifically, the plan is that any package in wheezy shipping a runtime
library in a multiarch directory should declare a Pre-Depends on the
metapackage 'multiarch-support'.
And the dependency would be added by either dpkg-dev,
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 at 11:12:54 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:36:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Specifically, the plan is that any package in wheezy shipping a runtime
library in a multiarch directory should declare a Pre-Depends on the
metapackage
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 11:12:29 +0100
Simon McVittie s...@debian.org wrote:
* lintian should warn (error?) if a binary package has libraries in a
multiarch
directory and doesn't pre-depend on multiarch-support
* lintian should perhaps also warn if a package uses debhelper compat 9
and
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 11:25 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
[...]
Lintian error (and an ftpmaster REJECT) if a binary package (not just
a library) has multiarch paths without debhelper compat 9. (This
protects against uploading packages converted with tools like
dpkg-cross -M -A (= 2.6.3).)
[...]
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:47:01 +0100
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 11:25 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
[...]
Lintian error (and an ftpmaster REJECT) if a binary package (not just
a library) has multiarch paths without debhelper compat 9. (This
protects
Simon McVittie s...@debian.org writes:
* lintian should warn (error?) if a binary package has libraries in a
multiarch directory and doesn't pre-depend on multiarch-support
Yes, this is what we did for the X.org transition and it seemed to work
reasonably well.
--
Russ Allbery
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 11:12:29AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 at 11:12:54 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:36:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Specifically, the plan is that any package in wheezy shipping a runtime
library in a multiarch
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 11:25:44AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
Lintian error (and an ftpmaster REJECT) if debhelper compat 9 is set
with no ${misc:PreDepends} set because that prevents the
multiarch-support addition. A failure to convert ${misc:PreDepends} to
multiarch-support would be a
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:36:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Specifically, the plan is that any package in wheezy shipping a runtime
library in a multiarch directory should declare a Pre-Depends on the
metapackage 'multiarch-support'. This package will be built from eglibc
source, and for
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
One of the things that held up the deployment of multiarch-friendly
library packages in Debian was the recognition that the host triplet
used on i386, i486-linux-gnu, was not suitable for cross-distro
standardization because it encodes information
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 07:31:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:36:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Specifically, the plan is that any package in wheezy shipping a runtime
library in a multiarch directory should declare a Pre-Depends on the
metapackage
Hi folks,
One of the things that held up the deployment of multiarch-friendly library
packages in Debian was the recognition that the host triplet used on i386,
i486-linux-gnu, was not suitable for cross-distro standardization because it
encodes information about the current default optimization
13 matches
Mail list logo
