Proposing a new field in the source control data (was: Proposing a new source control header to link to upstream BTSs)

Martín Ferrari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Following the trend to add metadata to the debian/control file that allows for the creation of new and powerful tools, I thought about the usefulness of a header that'd allow to automatically relate to upstream bug trackers. nitpick domain=terminology

Re: Proposing a new field in the source control data (was: Proposing a new source control header to link to upstream BTSs)

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Those pieces of data are called fields. Just like in RFC2822 messages or HTTP responses. Thanks for the correction. I always think of headers, because one usually refers to rfc2822 fields as headers, I didn't know it was

Re: Proposing a new field in the source control data

Martín Ferrari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Those pieces of data are called fields. Just like in RFC2822 messages or HTTP responses. Thanks for the correction. I always think of headers, because one usually refers to