Hi,
On Tuesday 12 April 2011 01.22:55 Scott Kitterman wrote:
The notion that /usr/bin/python pointing to any python3 version in the
near term is anything other than crazy talk is, well, crazy.
Agreed. However, it would be interesting to track which of the bg/major
python packages/frameworks
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 08:46, Adrian von Bidder avbid...@fortytwo.ch wrote:
Agreed. However, it would be interesting to track which of the bg/major
python packages/frameworks are not available on Python3 yet, if only as a
reference for the next time somebody proposes to have /usr/bin/python be
[Adrian von Bidder, 2011-04-13]
Agreed. However, it would be interesting to track which of the bg/major
python packages/frameworks are not available on Python3 yet, if only as a
reference for the next time somebody proposes to have /usr/bin/python be a
Python 3.
On Apr 11, 2011, at 07:22 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Hopefully it will gain additional sanity before approval (the authors did
improve it based on comments I sent them it could still be better). The
notion that /usr/bin/python pointing to any python3 version in the near term
is anything other
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 09:22:44 AM Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Apr 11, 2011, at 07:22 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Hopefully it will gain additional sanity before approval (the authors did
improve it based on comments I sent them it could still be better). The
notion that /usr/bin/python
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 09:22:44 AM Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Apr 11, 2011, at 07:22 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Hopefully it will gain additional sanity before approval (the authors did
improve it based on comments I sent them it could still be better). The
[Michael Gilbert, 2011-04-13]
Can't that be solved in the release notes when that happens? Something
like:
python3 is now the default /usr/bin/python, so if you have existing
python2 scripts you will need to make sure to use /usr/bin/python2
instead (or convert them to
Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
[Michael Gilbert, 2011-04-13]
Can't that be solved in the release notes when that happens? Something
like:
python3 is now the default /usr/bin/python, so if you have existing
python2 scripts you will need to make sure to use /usr/bin/python2
On Apr 13, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
I think it makes more sense to have a release or two where users can
fall back on python2. Well there needs to be at least one
where /usr/bin/python becomes python3 alerting users to the change and
giving them the python2 fallback, just so
On Apr 09, 2011, at 01:38 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
We've treated python and python3 as separate runtime environments. We also
have a default python3 (just in the middle of transitioning to 3.2). The
only meaningful change that would make python3 the 'default python' is if we
pointed
Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Apr 09, 2011, at 01:38 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
We've treated python and python3 as separate runtime environments. We
also
have a default python3 (just in the middle of transitioning to 3.2).
The
only meaningful change that would make python3 the
I noticed that this is still listed at http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals.
Obviously that was a Squeeze goal. The equivalent goal for Wheezy should be
python2.7 as default and python2.5 and python2.6 removed.
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
* Scott Kitterman (deb...@kitterman.com) [110409 19:07]:
Obviously that was a Squeeze goal. The equivalent goal for Wheezy should be
python2.7 as default and python2.5 and python2.6 removed.
Sure. Please feel free to fix that.
Andi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Scott Kitterman wrote:
I noticed that this is still listed at http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals.
Obviously that was a Squeeze goal. The equivalent goal for Wheezy should be
python2.7 as default and python2.5 and python2.6 removed.
Is it out of the question to target python3.x as the
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 01:33:01 PM Michael Gilbert wrote:
Scott Kitterman wrote:
I noticed that this is still listed at
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals.
Obviously that was a Squeeze goal. The equivalent goal for Wheezy should
be python2.7 as default and python2.5 and
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 01:26:12 PM Andreas Barth wrote:
* Scott Kitterman (deb...@kitterman.com) [110409 19:07]:
Obviously that was a Squeeze goal. The equivalent goal for Wheezy should
be python2.7 as default and python2.5 and python2.6 removed.
Sure. Please feel free to fix that.
On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:49:17 -0400, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com
wrote:
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 01:26:12 PM Andreas Barth wrote:
* Scott Kitterman (deb...@kitterman.com) [110409 19:07]:
Obviously that was a Squeeze goal. The equivalent goal for Wheezy
should
be python2.7 as
17 matches
Mail list logo