Hello Marc,
* Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-18 13:42]:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:51:45 +0100, Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-17 21:45]:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:02:16 +0100, Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Marc Haber wrote:
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just asked too to be a part of the maintainer team for dpatch.
I see. Let me summarize: You post your offer to adopt the package 60
seconds before another team which has already collaborated announces
taking over the package
He
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Marc Haber wrote:
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just asked too to be a part of the maintainer team for dpatch.
I see. Let me summarize: You post your offer to adopt the package
60 seconds before another team which has already collaborated
Hello Marc,
* Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-16 15:43]:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:40:33 +0900, Junichi Uekawa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I do care about dpatch, and I do use it a lot in my packages,
I will be willing to help out / adopt this package.
After organizing on IRC,
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:02:16 +0100, Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-16 15:43]:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:40:33 +0900, Junichi Uekawa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I do care about dpatch, and I do use it a lot in my packages,
I will be willing to help
Hello Marc,
* Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-17 21:45]:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:02:16 +0100, Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-16 15:43]:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:40:33 +0900, Junichi Uekawa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I do care about
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:51:45 +0100, Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-17 21:45]:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:02:16 +0100, Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-16 15:43]:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:40:33 +0900, Junichi
retitle 264567 RFA: dpatch -- patch maintenance system for Debian source
packages
thanks
I don't have time to properly maintain dpatch, nor do I use it anymore,
so a new maintainer is probably justified, to say the least.
You might consider this an O:, even. It is only RFA, because I do
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:50:36 +0100, Gergely Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
retitle 264567 RFA: dpatch -- patch maintenance system for Debian source
packages
thanks
I don't have time to properly maintain dpatch, nor do I use it anymore,
so a new maintainer is probably justified, to say the least
Hi,
retitle 264567 RFA: dpatch -- patch maintenance system for Debian source
packages
thanks
I don't have time to properly maintain dpatch, nor do I use it anymore,
so a new maintainer is probably justified, to say the least.
You might consider this an O:, even. It is only RFA
Hi,
* Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-16 11:08]:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:50:36 +0100, Gergely Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
retitle 264567 RFA: dpatch -- patch maintenance system for Debian source
packages
thanks
I don't have time to properly maintain dpatch, nor do I use it anymore
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:40:33 +0900, Junichi Uekawa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I do care about dpatch, and I do use it a lot in my packages,
I will be willing to help out / adopt this package.
After organizing on IRC, Junichi and I will take over the package.
Gergely has agreed, and an upload
I don't have time to properly maintain dpatch, nor do I use it anymore,
so a new maintainer is probably justified, to say the least.
You might consider this an O:, even. It is only RFA, because I do not
want to upload a new, probably half-broken dpatch just to orphan it.
I would be
13 matches
Mail list logo
