Hi!
On Sun, 2022-07-17 at 04:18:59 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> There's been talk about switching away from netkit-telnet and
> netkit-telnetd as the default implementations for some time now,
> and replacing them with the ones from inetutils, which is a maintained
> project and does see
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 05:15:07PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
Available in the archive yes, installed by default no way.
That makes this current thread mostly moot, as when not installed by
default (or a metapackage) you don't need any particular implementation
to be blessed.
I think the
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 05:43:35PM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Guillem" == Guillem Jover writes:
> Guillem> Hi! There's been talk about switching away from
> Guillem> netkit-telnet and netkit-telnetd as the default
> Guillem> implementations for some time now, and replacing
> "Guillem" == Guillem Jover writes:
Guillem> Hi! There's been talk about switching away from
Guillem> netkit-telnet and netkit-telnetd as the default
Guillem> implementations for some time now, and replacing them with
Guillem> the ones from inetutils, which is a maintained
Jeremy Stanley writes:
...
> This is getting increasingly off-topic, but you're able to get a
> modern SSH client to successfully connect to an old device which
> only speaks SSHv1 protocol?
There is: openssh-client-ssh1
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openssh-ssh1
Cheers, Phil.
--
|)|
On 2022-07-19 20:15:49 +0200 (+0200), Philipp Kern wrote:
[...]
> I found the client-side very tolerant of ancient server-side
> implementations when the right kinds of switches are passed to it
> (e.g. KexAlgorithms and HostKeyAlgorithms). I have yet to be
> unable to actually connect to a target
On 19.07.22 16:05, Michael Stone wrote:
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 01:49:53AM -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
Telnet is old, insecure and should not be used any more. What is the
point of
packaging a Telnet daemon when everyone should be using SSH. Telnet
Client I
can see because a person may
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 01:49:53AM -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
Telnet is old, insecure and should not be used any more. What is the point of
packaging a Telnet daemon when everyone should be using SSH. Telnet Client I
can see because a person may need to connect to a router or switch
On 2022-07-17 01:49:53 -0400 (-0400), Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
[...]
> Telnet is old, insecure and should not be used any more. What is
> the point of packaging a Telnet daemon when everyone should be
> using SSH. Telnet Client I can see because a person may need to
> connect to a router or
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 10:19 PM Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There's been talk about switching away from netkit-telnet and
> netkit-telnetd as the default implementations for some time now,
> and replacing them with the ones from inetutils, which is a maintained
> project and does see
Hi!
There's been talk about switching away from netkit-telnet and
netkit-telnetd as the default implementations for some time now,
and replacing them with the ones from inetutils, which is a maintained
project and does see releases (even though with a long cadence).
This has been discussed
11 matches
Mail list logo
