Re: RFC: behaviour of bts show command with new BTS default behaviour

2006-11-16 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 12:56:32AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 01:02:06AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: Thinking of changing the default behaviour of the devscripts bts show (aka bts bugs) command, and want to ask for opinions before I do so. The BTS behaviour of

Re: RFC: behaviour of bts show command with new BTS default behaviour

2006-11-16 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:50:46AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote: When using bts show package or going to http://bugs.debian.org/package; we get that behaviour, and I find both of them annoying. I switched the default to appending dist=untable because

Re: RFC: behaviour of bts show command with new BTS default behaviour

2006-11-16 Thread Damián Viano
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:57:21AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 12:56:32AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 01:02:06AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: Thinking of changing the default behaviour of the devscripts bts show (aka bts bugs) command, and

Re: RFC: behaviour of bts show command with new BTS default behaviour

2006-11-16 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:27:59AM -0300, Damián Viano wrote: I fixed bug#396232 in devscripts version 2.9.24. But when I went to http://bugs.debian.org/devscripts, it listed this bug among the open bugs. Why? Because m68k or some other arch had not yet autobuilt version 2.9.24 and was

Re: RFC: behaviour of bts show command with new BTS default behaviour

2006-11-16 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Julian Gilbey wrote: On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:50:46AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote: When using bts show package or going to http://bugs.debian.org/package; we get that behaviour, and I find both of them annoying. I

Re: RFC: behaviour of bts show command with new BTS default behaviour

2006-11-15 Thread Theodore Tso
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 01:02:06AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: Thinking of changing the default behaviour of the devscripts bts show (aka bts bugs) command, and want to ask for opinions before I do so. The BTS behaviour of http://bugs.debian.org/package has recently changed. It used to

Re: RFC: behaviour of bts show command with new BTS default behaviour

2006-11-13 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:50:46AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote: When using bts show package or going to http://bugs.debian.org/package; we get that behaviour, and I find both of them annoying. I switched the default to appending dist=untable because

Re: RFC: behaviour of bts show command with new BTS default behaviour

2006-11-13 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:50:46AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote: When using bts show package or going to http://bugs.debian.org/package; we get that behaviour, and I find both of them annoying. I

Re: RFC: behaviour of bts show command with new BTS default behaviour

2006-11-12 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006, Julian Gilbey wrote: Thinking of changing the default behaviour of the devscripts bts show (aka bts bugs) command, and want to ask for opinions before I do so. Perhaps you can use versions instead? http://bugs.debian.org/foo;version=x.y resolves to pkgreport with

Re: RFC: behaviour of bts show command with new BTS default behaviour

2006-11-12 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 01:02:06AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: Hi all! Thinking of changing the default behaviour of the devscripts bts show (aka bts bugs) command, and want to ask for opinions before I do so. [...] It now resolves to:

Re: RFC: behaviour of bts show command with new BTS default behaviour

2006-11-12 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote: When using bts show package or going to http://bugs.debian.org/package; we get that behaviour, and I find both of them annoying. I switched the default to appending dist=untable because it actually tells you which bugs affect unstable; it's far more

Re: RFC: behaviour of bts show command with new BTS default behaviour

2006-11-12 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 12:19:30PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 01:02:06AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: Hi all! Thinking of changing the default behaviour of the devscripts bts show (aka bts bugs) command, and want to ask for opinions before I do so. [...] It now

Re: RFC: behaviour of bts show command with new BTS default behaviour

2006-11-12 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Julian Gilbey wrote: http://bugs.debian.org/397925). So the only thing within my ability is to change the devscripts bts command so that it behaves in the way it used to before the BTS change. Could you make it configurable? I like the show unstable bugs behaviour far

Re: RFC: behaviour of bts show command with new BTS default behaviour

2006-11-12 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 01:15:21PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Julian Gilbey wrote: http://bugs.debian.org/397925). So the only thing within my ability is to change the devscripts bts command so that it behaves in the way it used to before the BTS change.

Re: RFC: behaviour of bts show command with new BTS default behaviour

2006-11-12 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:50:46AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: Some other thing it does now is that if I file a bug against a package before the bts knows about it, it shows up as in other versions or something. You should be hard pressed to be able to actually install packages before

RFC: behaviour of bts show command with new BTS default behaviour

2006-11-11 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi all! Thinking of changing the default behaviour of the devscripts bts show (aka bts bugs) command, and want to ask for opinions before I do so. The BTS behaviour of http://bugs.debian.org/package has recently changed. It used to resolve to: