https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
https is getting everywhere. If you don't have ca's you cannot process them
properly.
I think https working is going to be important even for almost all embedded
cases. Most iot deployments
include something like calling the mothership, which ought to be
Hey Julien,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 12:00:56PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 02:47:25PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 03:10:47PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> > And which of standard or important made most sense (AIUI, standard
>> > means
Hi Antonio,
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 02:47:25PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 03:10:47PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > And which of standard or important made most sense (AIUI, standard
> > means "installed by default in d-i" and important means "installed by
> >
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 03:10:47PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> And which of standard or important made most sense (AIUI, standard
> means "installed by default in d-i" and important means "installed by
> default in debootstrap").
wget is already Priority: standard and recommends
Marco d'Itri writes:
> On Jan 21, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> So I'd like to raise the priority of ca-certificates from optional to
>> at least standard, as a signal that it should be installed on
> Good idea: I think that "standard" is appropriate.
I agree.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)
On Jan 21, Julien Cristau wrote:
> So I'd like to raise the priority of ca-certificates from optional to
> at least standard, as a signal that it should be installed on
Good idea: I think that "standard" is appropriate.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[bcc: {openssl,ca-certificates}@packages.d.o]
Hi,
the ca-certificates package is currently "Priority: optional", like most
of the archive. It's Recommended by a bunch of packages, Depended on by
an equivalent number, but I'm not sure if this is optimal. I suspect
most packages can be
7 matches
Mail list logo
