Re: RFS: kernelcheck

2009-06-22 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Lars Wirzenius wrote: la, 2009-06-20 kello 08:56 +0200, David Paleino kirjoitti: Is material copyrightable under a nickname, instead of a realname? Yes, in all jurisdictions I am aware of. It's called a pseudonym and tends to be explicitly recognized by copyright laws. but I don't think is

Re: RFS: kernelcheck

2009-06-22 Thread Russ Allbery
Giacomo A. Catenazzi c...@debian.org writes: but I don't think is is usable in open source. Editors/publishers are required to know the real name, Why are editors/publishers required to know the real name? Maybe this is a jurisdiction-dependent issue? I don't know of any such constraint in

Re: RFS: kernelcheck

2009-06-22 Thread Russ Allbery
Jan Hauke Rahm i...@jhr-online.de writes: Speaking for germany (as I already did in this thread), you have to disclose your identity in court to make use of your civil rights. IOW you cannot lay claim to your copyright if you are not identified as the copyright holder. A pseudonym is then

Re: RFS: kernelcheck

2009-06-22 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 09:22:17AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Jan Hauke Rahm i...@jhr-online.de writes: Practically, I do see problems in the US, too: do you think a US court would grant you copyright if the only statement in a file were (C) 2009, cate? Explicit copyright notice is not

Re: RFS: kernelcheck

2009-06-22 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 09:02:59AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Giacomo A. Catenazzi c...@debian.org writes: but I don't think is is usable in open source. Editors/publishers are required to know the real name, Why are editors/publishers required to know the real name? Maybe this is a

Re: RFS: kernelcheck

2009-06-22 Thread Ben Pfaff
Jan Hauke Rahm i...@jhr-online.de writes: Practically, I do see problems in the US, too: do you think a US court would grant you copyright if the only statement in a file were (C) 2009, cate? The copyright office has a webpage that explains some of these issues at

Re: RFS: kernelcheck

2009-06-20 Thread Ben Finney
[moving to debian-devel as this is a topic broader than debian-mentors] Master Kernel master.kernel.cont...@gmail.com writes: Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes: [To be likely to have your package sponsored,] You will need to identify yourself; “Master Kernel” is hardly likely

Re: RFS: kernelcheck

2009-06-20 Thread David Paleino
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:25:20 +1000, Ben Finney wrote: [moving to debian-devel as this is a topic broader than debian-mentors] Master Kernel master.kernel.cont...@gmail.com writes: Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes: [To be likely to have your package sponsored,] You will

Re: RFS: kernelcheck

2009-06-20 Thread Lars Wirzenius
la, 2009-06-20 kello 08:56 +0200, David Paleino kirjoitti: Is material copyrightable under a nickname, instead of a realname? Yes, in all jurisdictions I am aware of. It's called a pseudonym and tends to be explicitly recognized by copyright laws. The history of literature is full of people

Re: RFS: kernelcheck

2009-06-20 Thread David Paleino
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:21:04 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: la, 2009-06-20 kello 08:56 +0200, David Paleino kirjoitti: Is material copyrightable under a nickname, instead of a realname? Yes, in all jurisdictions I am aware of. It's called a pseudonym and tends to be explicitly recognized by

Re: RFS: kernelcheck

2009-06-20 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Sat Jun 20 09:28, David Paleino wrote: Now that I read Ben's mail again, I see that his concern is also about the Maintainer field. I suppose that should be a real name too then? Or is it ok having a pseudonym because it's the sponsor taking responsibility for the upload? (given that using

Re: RFS: kernelcheck

2009-06-20 Thread David Paleino
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:04:32 +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote: On Sat Jun 20 09:28, David Paleino wrote: Now that I read Ben's mail again, I see that his concern is also about the Maintainer field. I suppose that should be a real name too then? Or is it ok having a pseudonym because it's the

Re: RFS: kernelcheck

2009-06-20 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Sat Jun 20 10:19, David Paleino wrote: Also, going back to the note about reputation; There's no reason reputation can't be associated with a pseudonym or with a GPG key attached to a pseudonym. How do you sign such a key? You'd break the web of trust, if you don't check at least

Re: RFS: kernelcheck

2009-06-20 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:21:04AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: la, 2009-06-20 kello 08:56 +0200, David Paleino kirjoitti: Is material copyrightable under a nickname, instead of a realname? Yes, in all jurisdictions I am aware of. It's called a pseudonym and tends to be explicitly

Re: RFS: kernelcheck

2009-06-20 Thread Russ Allbery
David Paleino d.pale...@gmail.com writes: On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:04:32 +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote: Also, going back to the note about reputation; There's no reason reputation can't be associated with a pseudonym or with a GPG key attached to a pseudonym. How do you sign such a key? You'd