* Ian Jackson | 2010-09-15 11:56:49 [+0100]:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
I'd say they're serious bugs if packages in the archive suffer from
the misbuild, and normal ones if not.
I agree.
Okay. In that case I open this weekend bugs against the packages I
identified [0] with
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc [100914 13:45]:
Sounds reasonable. However sometimes package maintainer argueue that the
policy says clean build environment and having package X intalled is
no longer clean (thus I have a problem and buildds do not).
A package more installed
Bernhard R. Link writes (Re: /usr/share/info/dir.gz if install-info is
installed):
Packages not building in a real environment is a serious problem for our
infrastructure. Having some extremely special build environment for your
software betrays one of the most important principles of free
* Peter Samuelson | 2010-09-14 16:19:54 [-0500]:
[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]
Sounds reasonable. However sometimes package maintainer argueue that the
policy says clean build environment and having package X intalled is
no longer clean (thus I have a problem and buildds do not).
Where does
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes (Re: /usr/share/info/dir.gz if install-info
is installed):
Sounds reasonable. However sometimes package maintainer argueue that the
policy says clean build environment and having package X intalled is
no longer clean (thus I have a problem and buildds do
* Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk [100915 15:54]:
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes (Re: /usr/share/info/dir.gz if install-info
is installed):
Sounds reasonable. However sometimes package maintainer argueue that the
policy says clean build environment and having package X
* Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org, 2010-09-15, 17:05:
As this is not really a new problem and easy to check for, I'm more
surprised that is not yet catched by lintian.
It is: package-contains-info-dir-file. And it's even on ftp-master's
autoreject list.
--
Jakub Wilk
signature.asc
* Bernhard R. Link | 2010-09-15 17:05:05 [+0200]:
Or is there no lintian
run for buildd (i.e. unsourcefull) uploads yet?
[0] says
Those automated rejects will only be done on sourceful uploads to
unstable and experimental.
So I would say no, there isn't.
[0]
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:08:13AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Hello,
I just built docbook2x and gettext and both contained the file mentioned
in subject. install-info created dir which got gzip later in the build
process. The strance thing is the almost none of the buildds ship
Hi,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc (14/09/2010):
So this is to let you know, to remove this package in order to avoid
further problems :)
packages really ought to build if that package is installed…
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Aurelien Jarno | 2010-09-14 11:59:51 [+0200]:
install-info is not present on the kfreebsd-i386 buildds, though it is
not possible that it was installed at some point.
Maybe it got removed in the meantime. If you look at [0] you see dir.gz.
If you look at build log from himalia1[1] and grep for
* Cyril Brulebois | 2010-09-14 12:10:01 [+0200]:
Hi,
Hi,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc (14/09/2010):
So this is to let you know, to remove this package in order to avoid
further problems :)
packages really ought to build if that package is installed???
This is true.
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc (14/09/2010):
packages really ought to build if that package is installed…
This is true. However you can't install two packages containing this
file.
Sorry, I should have been more explicit: build *properly*, i.e. do
what's needed to avoid
* Cyril Brulebois | 2010-09-14 12:53:20 [+0200]:
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc (14/09/2010):
packages really ought to build if that package is installed???
This is true. However you can't install two packages containing this
file.
Sorry, I should have been more explicit:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:11:14PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Aurelien Jarno | 2010-09-14 11:59:51 [+0200]:
install-info is not present on the kfreebsd-i386 buildds, though it is
not possible that it was installed at some point.
Oops my fault. I wanted to say not impossible.
* Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org, 2010-09-14, 12:00:
So this is to let you know, to remove this package in order to avoid
further problems :)
packages really ought to build if that package is installed…
Should these kind of bugs (FTBFS or producing broken packages in
non-clean environment)
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 14:55:33 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org, 2010-09-14, 12:00:
So this is to let you know, to remove this package in order to
avoid further problems :)
packages really ought to build if that package is installed…
Should these kind of bugs
[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]
Sounds reasonable. However sometimes package maintainer argueue that the
policy says clean build environment and having package X intalled is
no longer clean (thus I have a problem and buildds do not).
Where does the policy say that?
I can't find anything that even
18 matches
Mail list logo
